Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22570603›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2012

Adhesion failures determine the pattern of choroidal neovascularization in the eye: a computer simulation study.

Abbas Shirinifard, James Alexander Glazier, Maciej Swat, J Scott Gens, Fereydoon Family, Yi Jiang, Hans E Grossniklaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A computational dynamic systems model forCurrent research in toxicology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RPE Cell and Sheet Properties in Normal and Diseased Eyes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abbas ShirinifardThe Biocomplexity Institute and Department of Physics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America. ashirini@indiana.edu
James Alexander Glazier
Maciej Swat
J Scott Gens
Fereydoon Family
Yi Jiang
Hans E Grossniklaus

Funding

P30-Core Grant for Vision Research Core CP30EY006360 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOATRIGHT, JEFFREY H · 1986 to 2025
$15.3M
MSM - Multiscale Studies of Segmentation in Vertebrate *R01GM076692 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI GLAZIER, JAMES ALEXANDER, STERN, CLAUDIO D · 2005 to 2015
$5.5M
Development and Improvement of Tissue Simulation ToolkitR01GM077138 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI D'SOUZA, ROSHAN M, GLAZIER, JAMES ALEXANDER · 2007 to 2015
$4.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY006360NEI NIH HHS P30EY06360NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01 GM077138-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01 GM076692-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076692NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) of the macular area of the retina is the major cause of severe vision loss in adults. In CNV, after choriocapillaries initially penetrate Bruch's membrane (BrM), invading vessels may regress or expand (CNV initiation). Next, during Early and Late CNV, the expanding vasculature usually spreads in one of three distinct patterns: in a layer between BrM and the retinal pigment epithelium (sub-RPE or Type 1 CNV), in a layer between the RPE and the photoreceptors (sub-retinal or Type 2 CNV) or in both loci simultaneously (combined pattern or Type 3 CNV). While most studies hypothesize that CNV primarily results from growth-factor effects or holes in BrM, our three-dimensional simulations of multi-cell model of the normal and pathological maculae recapitulate the three growth patterns, under the hypothesis that CNV results from combinations of impairment of: 1) RPE-RPE epithelial junctional adhesion, 2) Adhesion of the RPE basement membrane complex to BrM (RPE-BrM adhesion), and 3) Adhesion of the RPE to the photoreceptor outer segments (RPE-POS adhesion). Our key findings are that when an endothelial tip cell penetrates BrM: 1) RPE with normal epithelial junctions, basal attachment to BrM and apical attachment to POS resists CNV. 2) Small holes in BrM do not, by themselves, initiate CNV. 3) RPE with normal epithelial junctions and normal apical RPE-POS adhesion, but weak adhesion to BrM (e.g. due to lipid accumulation in BrM) results in Early sub-RPE CNV. 4) Normal adhesion of RBaM to BrM, but reduced apical RPE-POS or epithelial RPE-RPE adhesion (e.g. due to inflammation) results in Early sub-retinal CNV. 5) Simultaneous reduction in RPE-RPE epithelial binding and RPE-BrM adhesion results in either sub-RPE or sub-retinal CNV which often progresses to combined pattern CNV. These findings suggest that defects in adhesion dominate CNV initiation and progression.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsFocal AdhesionsModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell AdhesionChoroidChoroidal NeovascularizationComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID22570603
PMCPMC3342931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.