ReviewPLoS computational biology2012
Modeling planarian regeneration: a primer for reverse-engineering the worm.
Review in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Mapping the knowledge landscape of planarian regeneration: a century of bibliometric insights.Biology direct · 2026Article
- A Post-Surgical Retinal Progenitor Cell Niche is the Primary Source of Embryonic Eye Regrowth inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Dual Impact of Nanotechnologies on Health and Environment Through Alternative Bridging Models.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Article
- Emergent Stable Tissue Shapes from the Regulatory Feedback between Morphogens and Cell Growth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Terminal differentiation precedes functional circuit integration in the peduncle neurons in regenerating Hydra vulgaris.Neural development · 2024Article
- Mechanistic regulation of planarian shape during growth and degrowth.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Collective intelligence: A unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substrates.Communications biology · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive conceptual and computational dynamics framework for autonomous regeneration of form and function in biological organisms.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Importance of clitellar tissue in the regeneration ability of earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae.Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Article
- One of the Primary Functions of Tissue-Resident Pluripotent Pericytes Cells May Be to Regulate Normal Organ Growth and Maturation: Implications for Attempts to Repair Tissues Later in Life.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Stem Cell Homing in Intrathecal Applications and Inspirations for Improvement Paths.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A Computational Approach to Explaining Bioelectrically Induced Persistent, Stochastic Changes of Axial Polarity in Planarian Regeneration.Bioelectricity · 2022Article
- PCD Genes-From Patients to Model Organisms and Back to Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Computational Systems Biology of Morphogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Formalizing Phenotypes of Regeneration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Stability and robustness properties of bioelectric networks: A computational approach.Biophysics reviews · 2021Review
- Signaling gradients in surface dynamics as basis for planarian regeneration.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Does regeneration recapitulate phylogeny? Planaria as a model of body-axis specification in ancestral eumetazoa.Communicative & integrative biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A mechanistic understanding of robust self-assembly and repair capabilities of complex systems would have enormous implications for basic evolutionary developmental biology as well as for transformative applications in regenerative biomedicine and the engineering of highly fault-tolerant cybernetic systems. Molecular biologists are working to identify the pathways underlying the remarkable regenerative abilities of model species that perfectly regenerate limbs, brains, and other complex body parts. However, a profound disconnect remains between the deluge of high-resolution genetic and protein data on pathways required for regeneration, and the desired spatial, algorithmic models that show how self-monitoring and growth control arise from the synthesis of cellular activities. This barrier to progress in the understanding of morphogenetic controls may be breached by powerful techniques from the computational sciences-using non-traditional modeling approaches to reverse-engineer systems such as planaria: flatworms with a complex bodyplan and nervous system that are able to regenerate any body part after traumatic injury. Currently, the involvement of experts from outside of molecular genetics is hampered by the specialist literature of molecular developmental biology: impactful collaborations across such different fields require that review literature be available that presents the key functional capabilities of important biological model systems while abstracting away from the often irrelevant and confusing details of specific genes and proteins. To facilitate modeling efforts by computer scientists, physicists, engineers, and mathematicians, we present a different kind of review of planarian regeneration. Focusing on the main patterning properties of this system, we review what is known about the signal exchanges that occur during regenerative repair in planaria and the cellular mechanisms that are thought to underlie them. By establishing an engineering-like style for reviews of the molecular developmental biology of biomedically important model systems, significant fresh insights and quantitative computational models will be developed by new collaborations between biology and the information sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.