Pioneering the Xenopus oocyte and egg extract system.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Evaluating the Validity of Model Organisms: A Review and a New Framework for Biologists.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
   Review
2. A passive protein environment offsets RNA folding energetics in cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
   Article
3. Meiosis initiation: a story of two sexes in all creatures great and small.The Biochemical journal · 2021
   Review
4. Light-inducible activation of cell cycle progression in Xenopus egg extracts under microfluidic confinement.Lab on a chip · 2019
   Article
5. SRC-family tyrosine kinases in oogenesis, oocyte maturation and fertilization: an evolutionary perspective.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2014
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as