ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2012
Distinct genetic alterations in pediatric glioblastomas.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating extent of resection in pediatric glioblastoma: a multiple propensity score-adjusted population-based analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016Article
- Vaccination strategies for neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology · 2015Review
- TET family proteins: oxidation activity, interacting molecules, and functions in diseases.Chemical reviews · 2015Review
- IDH1/2 mutations target a key hallmark of cancer by deregulating cellular metabolism in glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2013Review
- What a difference a hydroxyl makes: mutant IDH, (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, and cancer.Genes & development · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric high-grade tumors, especially glioblastomas (GBs), can be clinically devastating but are under-studied in comparison with adult GBs (aGBs). Molecular features of pediatric GBs (pGBs) are poorly understood and novel-targeted therapies have not been routinely used in pediatric patients with GBs.
methodsTwenty-four non-brainstem pGBs were studied. To compare pGBs with aGBs, immunohistochemical staining and fluorescent in situ hybridization were performed in paraffin-embedded tissues. Microarray gene expression analyses were performed in snap-frozen tissues of four primary pGBs, six primary aGBs, and one non-neoplastic brain.
resultsImmunohistochemial p16 loss was more frequent in pGBs, whereas p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, and phosphatase and tensin homolog loss were similar to that of aGBs. No case was isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 immunopositive or showed the IDH1 R132/IDH2 R172 mutation, suggesting primary GB. Microarray analysis revealed two pGB subtypes (A and B). Type B pGBs and aGBs had similar gene expression profiles; however, the profiles of type A pGBs differed from those of aGBs. In type A pGBs, we identified 90 up- and 63 down-regulated genes; platelet-derived growth factor receptor α polypeptide and CCND2 expression were significantly reduced, whereas they were up-regulated in aGBs.
conclusionsOur study found two distinct pGB gene expression profiles: one similar to that of aGBs and the other different. We identified significantly up- and down-regulated genes in pGBs that may provide better targets for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic uses; however, more studies are required to determine the classification and optimal treatment of pediatric patients with GBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.