ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2012
Molecular interactions of c-ABL mutants in complex with imatinib/nilotinib: a computational study using linear interaction energy (LIE) calculations.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure and Dynamics of the ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase and Its Important Role in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2025Review
- Structural bioinformatics analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants reveals higher hACE2 receptor binding affinity for Omicron B.1.1.529 spike RBD compared to wild type reference.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Discovery of Novel BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Using a Pharmacophore Modeling and Virtual Screening Approach.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Insight on Mutation-Induced Resistance from Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Native and Mutated CSF-1R and KIT.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In spite of the effectiveness of Imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment, resistance has repeatedly been reported and is associated with point mutations in the BCR-ABL chimeric gene. To overcome this resistance, several inhibitors of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity were developed. In this context, computational simulations have become a powerful tool for understanding drug-protein interactions. Herein, we report a comparative molecular dynamics analysis of the interaction between two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib or nilotinib) against wild type c-ABL protein and 12 mutants, using the semi-empirical linear interaction energy (LIE) method, to assess the feasibility of this approach for studying resistance against the inhibitory activity of these drugs. In addition, to understand the structural changes that are associated with resistance, we describe the behavior of water molecules that interact simultaneously with specific residues (Glu286, Lys271 and Asp381) of c-ABL (wild type or mutant) and their relationship with drug resistance. Experimental IC50 values for the interaction between imatinib, wild type c-ABL, and 12 mutants were used to obtain the proper LIE coefficients (α, β and γ) to estimate the free energy of the binding of imatinib with wild-type and mutant proteins, and values were extrapolated for the analysis of the nilotinib/c-ABL interaction. Our results indicate that LIE was suitable to predict the superior inhibitory activity of nilotinib and the resistance to inhibition that was observed in c-ABL mutants. Additionally, for c-ABL mutants, the observed number of water molecules being turned over while interacting with amino acids Glu286, Lys271 and Asp381 was associated with resistance to imatinib, resulting in a less effective inhibition of the kinase activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.