ArticleNeuroradiology2012
Evaluation of the supraaortic arteries using non-contrast-enhanced Velocity MR angiography "Inhance".
Article in Neuroradiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-contrast magnetic resonance venography with Inhance 3D Velocity: diagnostic performance for intracranial venous thrombosis.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of facial arteries for pre-operative evaluation of vascularized submental lymph node flaps.BMC medical imaging · 2019Article
- Simultaneous Visualization of Vessels and Brain Tumor with Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional Phase-contrast MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2018Article
- Article
- Non-ECG-gated unenhanced MRA of the carotids: optimization and clinical feasibility.European radiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to compare the recently developed phase contrast-based Inhance 3D Velocity magnetic resonance angiography technique (Inhance) to the contrast-enhanced standard method (CE-MRA) in the evaluation of the supraaortic arteries.
methodsInhance and CE-MRA were performed in ten consecutive patients with a suspected pathology of the supraaortic arteries on a 3-T MR scanner. Two neuroradiologists evaluated in consensus both sequences regarding the visualisation of the supraaortic arteries and their segments on a five-point score. Diagnostic certainty regarding the overall presence of a vascular pathology was rated on the same five-point score.
resultsOn CE-MRA as well as on Inhance, a vascular pathology of the supraaortic arteries was detected in seven patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall diagnostic certainty regarding the presence or absence of pathologic findings for CE-MRA compared to Inhance. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found with regard to visualisation of the distal cervical and intracranial arterial segments, while CE-MRA was superior to Inhance in the visualisation of the origins of the cervical vessels from the aortic arch.
conclusionNon-contrast Inhance proved useful in the evaluation of the supraaortic arteries with limited assessment of the proximal supraaortic branches. Hence, this technique features a valuable alternative to CE-MRA in the visualisation of the supraaortic arteries, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22569954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.