Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22569002›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2012

Brain response to food stimulation in obese, normal weight, and successful weight loss maintainers.

Lawrence H Sweet, Jason J Hassenstab, Jeanne M McCaffery, Hollie A Raynor, Dale S Bond, Kathryn E Demos, Andreana P Haley, Ronald A Cohen, Angelo Del Parigi, Rena R Wing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Weight Loss and Appetite Control in Women.Current obesity reports · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Appetite and body weight regulation after bariatric surgery.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Food related processes in the insular cortex.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lawrence H SweetButler Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. Lawrence_Sweet@brown.edu
Jason J Hassenstab
Jeanne M McCaffery
Hollie A Raynor
Dale S Bond
Kathryn E Demos
Andreana P Haley
Ronald A Cohen
Angelo Del Parigi
Rena R Wing

Funding

University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Karyn A Esser, Todd Manini · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
Long-Term Weight Loss Maintenance (RMI)R01DK066787 · NIDDK · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI WING, RENA R · 2004 to 2007
$1.6M
HEART DISEASE, CNS DYSFUNCTION &OUTCOME IN THE ELDERLYR01AG017975 · NIA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI COHEN, RONALD A · 2000 to 2004
$1.5M
Increasing Physical Activity Among Inactive Bariatric Surgery PatientsK01DK083438 · NIDDK · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI BOND, DALE S · 2009 to 2013
$654k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017975NIDDK NIH HHS DK066787-02S2NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK083438NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK066787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As many people struggle with maintenance of weight loss, the study of successful weight loss maintainers (SWLM) can yield important insights into factors contributing to weight loss maintenance. However, little research has examined how SWLM differ from people who are obese or normal weight (NW) in brain response to orosensory stimulation. The goal of this study was to determine if SWLM exhibit different brain responses to orosensory stimulation. Brain response to 1-min orosensory stimulation with a lemon lollipop was assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging among 49 participants, including SWLM (n = 17), NW (n = 18), and obese (n = 14) controls. Significant brain responses were observed in nine brain regions, including the bilateral insula, left inferior frontal gyrus, left putamen, and other sensory regions. All regions also exhibited significant attenuation of this response over 1 min. The SWLM exhibited greater response compared with the other groups in all brain regions. Findings suggest that the response to orosensory stimulation peaks within 40 s and attenuates significantly between 40 and 60 s in regions associated with sensation, reward, and inhibitory control. Greater reactivity among the SWLM suggests that greater sensory reactivity to orosensory stimulation, increased anticipated reward, and subsequently greater inhibitory processing are associated with weight loss maintenance.

Indexed as

CuesFoodMagnetic Resonance ImagingRewardWeight LossAdultAnalysis of VarianceCerebral CortexFastingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID22569002
PMCPMC3483466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.