Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2012
Q-TWiST analysis to estimate overall benefit for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated in a phase III trial of sunitinib vs interferon-α.
Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Tolerability of Alternative Dosing Schedules for Sunitinib: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2020Pooled it
- Immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Analysis of quality-adjusted survival time without symptoms or toxicity for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as treatment for previously untreated participants with advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- Trial
- A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC).Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2019Trial
- A Q-TWiST Analysis Comparing Nivolumab and Therapy of Investigator's Choice in Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Platinum-Refractory Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Trial
- Quality-adjusted survival of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone among treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma: a quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Q-TWiST analysis comparing ipilimumab/dacarbazine vs placebo/dacarbazine for patients with stage III/IV melanoma.British journal of cancer · 2013Trial
- Time without transfusion reliance: a novel patient-centric metric for new therapies in myelodysplastic syndromes.Haematologica · 2023Article
- Transarterial Radioembolization Versus Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Time to Deterioration in Quality of Life.Advances in therapy · 2022Article
- Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) for Lenvatinib plus Everolimus Versus Everolimus Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.European urology open science · 2021Article
- Balancing efficacy and quality of life measurements among metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) studies.Oncoscience · 2021Article
- The Need for Combined Assessment of Multiple Outcomes in Noninferiority Trials in Oncology.JAMA oncology · 2020Article
- Q-TWiST Analysis to Assess Benefit-Risk of Pembrolizumab in Patients with PD-L1-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Article
- A practical guide to understanding, using and including patient reported outcomes in clinical trials in ovarian cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2018Review
- Experience with sunitinib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Therapeutic advances in urology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn a randomised phase III trial of treatment-naive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, sunitinib showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared with interferon (IFN)-α. We assessed between-treatment differences in overall benefit using a quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease progression or Toxicity of treatment (TWiST; Gelber and Goldhirsch) analysis.
methodsIn this analysis, in which only grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities were included, overall survival was partitioned into three health states: toxicity (time with toxicity after randomisation and before progression), time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity, and time from progression until death. Between-treatment differences in the mean duration of each state were calculated. A threshold utility analysis was used to assess quality-adjusted TWiST (Q-TWiST) outcomes.
resultsQ-TWiST scores showed that quality-adjusted survival time was greater with sunitinib than with IFN-α, even though certain grade 3/4 toxicities occurred more frequently with sunitinib. For both treatments, the mean number of days with toxicity was small compared with PFS. This effect was more pronounced with sunitinib in which time spent without progression or toxicity was 151 days greater than with IFN-α.
conclusionPatients randomised to sunitinib had longer clinical benefit, defined as Q-TWiST scores, than patients randomised to IFN-α.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.