Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22567357›Full record

ArticleGenetics research international2011

Comparative Study of Cyanobacterial and E. coli RNA Polymerases: Misincorporation, Abortive Transcription, and Dependence on Divalent Cations.

Masahiko Imashimizu, Kan Tanaka, Nobuo Shimamoto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics research international, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structure and function of the Si3 insertion integrated into the trigger loop/helix of cyanobacterial RNA polymerase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Engineered transcriptional systems for cyanobacterial biotechnology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The RNA polymerase of marine cyanophage Syn5.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013
    Article
  14. Basic mechanism of transcription by RNA polymerase II.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Regulatory Tools for Controlling Gene Expression in Cyanobacteria.Advances in experimental medicine and biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Masahiko ImashimizuStructural Biology Center, National Institute of Genetics, and Department of Genetics, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.
Kan Tanaka
Nobuo Shimamoto
Chiba University · JPKyoto Sangyo University · JPNational Institute of Genetics · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If Mg(2+) ion is replaced by Mn(2+) ion, RNA polymerase tends to misincorporate noncognate nucleotide, which is thought to be one of the reasons for the toxicity of Mn(2+) ion. Therefore, most cells have Mn(2+) ion at low intracellular concentrations, but cyanobacteria need the ion at a millimolar concentration to maintain photosynthetic machinery. To analyse the mechanism for resistance against the abundant Mn(2+) ion, we compared the properties of cyanobacterial and E. coli RNA polymerases. The cyanobacterial enzyme showed a lower level of abortive transcription and less misincorporation than the E. coli enzyme. Moreover, the cyanobacterial enzyme showed a slower rate of the whole elongation by an order of magnitude, paused more frequently, and cleaved its transcript faster in the absence of NTPs. In conclusion, cyanobacterial RNA polymerase maintains the fidelity of transcription against Mn(2+) ion by deliberate incorporation of a nucleotide at the cost of the elongation rate. The cyanobacterial and the E. coli enzymes showed different sensitivities to Mg(2+) ion, and the physiological role of the difference is also discussed.

Identifiers

PMID22567357
PMCPMC3335489
OpenAlexW2157737106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.