Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22567207›Full record

ArticleOman medical journal2008

Cerebro spinal fluid analysis in childhood bacterial meningitis.

Thomas V, Riaz Ahmed, Qasim S

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oman medical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CSF Proteins as Discreminatory Markers of Tubercular and Pyogenic Meningitis.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas V
Riaz Ahmed
Qasim S

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze the lumbar puncture of all suspected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for suspected meningitis.

methodsThis study was undertaken in the department of Child Health, the Royal Hospital. The details of CSF of all files of the children who had undergone lumbar puncture for suspected meningitis from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004; were enrolled for the study.

resultsA total of 395 lumbar punctures were done to exclude bacterial meningitis. Out of the 142 CSF studies in neonates, 17 (12%) had the cytology suggestive of bacterial meningitis and 15 (88%) of them being culture positive. The commonest pathogen was Group B Streptococcus (70%).The bacterial antigens were positive only in 41% of the confirmed cases of bacterial meningitis, all being that of Group B Streptococcus and gram stain positivity in 45 percent of cases. In the 1- 3 months group all the 17 lumbar punctures were normal. Of the 179 lumbar punctures done in 3-18 months group, only 11(6%) were abnormal, 72% being culture positive. Streptococcus pneumonia was the commonest organism (88%). Bacterial antigens were positive only in 2 of the 8 culture positive cases where gram stain was positive in 4 out of 8 cases. Irritability, lethargy and sick looking appearance were present in all the positive cases. None of the 28 children from 18 months to 5 years had abnormal CSF or positive CSF culture.

conclusionsBased on the fact that only 7% of the 395 CSF studies were abnormal, we conclude that better clinical judgment and diagnostic criteria are warranted, before laying out guidelines for lumbar puncture to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Besides fever and convulsions as indicators for CSF studies clinical parameters such as irritability, lethargy and sick looking appearance are better indicators.

Identifiers

PMID22567207
PMCPMC3338990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.