Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22567069›Full record

Trial reportOpen medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal2011

The effect of a biofeedback-based stress management tool on physician stress: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Jane B Lemaire, Jean E Wallace, Adriane M Lewin, Jill de Grood, Jeffrey P Schaefer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05239065 (Knowledge Translation of Personalized Stress Management in Occupational Populations With Application of HUAWEI Portable Devices), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05239065 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Knowledge Translation of Personalized Stress Management in Occupational Populations With Application of HUAWEI Portable Devices

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyRan2021 to 2022Enrolled400ConditionsStress, Psychological, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Emotional StressArmsThe basic intervention, The personalized interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Addressing Mental Health Symptoms Among COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Pilot Study.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jane B LemaireDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Health Sciences Center, 3330 University Drive NW, Calgary AB T2N 4N1; 403 220-4506, Canada. lemaire@ucalgary.ca
Jean E Wallace
Adriane M Lewin
Jill de Grood
Jeffrey P Schaefer
Canadian Veterinary Medical Association · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians often experience work-related stress that may lead to personal harm and impaired professional performance. Biofeedback has been used to manage stress in various populations.

objectiveTo determine whether a biofeedback-based stress management tool, consisting of rhythmic breathing, actively self-generated positive emotions and a portable biofeedback device, reduces physician stress.

designRandomized controlled trial measuring efficacy of a stress-reduction intervention over 28 days, with a 28-day open-label trial extension to assess effectiveness.

settingUrban tertiary care hospital.

participantsForty staff physicians (23 men and 17 women) from various medical practices (1 from primary care, 30 from a medical specialty and 9 from a surgical specialty) were recruited by means of electronic mail, regular mail and posters placed in the physicians' lounge and throughout the hospital.

interventionPhysicians in the intervention group were instructed to use a biofeedback-based stress management tool three times daily. Participants in both the control and intervention groups received twice-weekly support visits from the research team over 28 days, with the intervention group also receiving re-inforcement in the use of the stress management tool during these support visits. During the 28-day extension period, both the control and the intervention groups received the intervention, but without intensive support from the research team.

main outcome measureStress was measured with a scale developed to capture short-term changes in global perceptions of stress for physicians (maximum score 200).

resultsDuring the randomized controlled trial (days 0 to 28), the mean stress score declined significantly for the intervention group (change -14.7, standard deviation [SD] 23.8; p = 0.013) but not for the control group (change -2.2, SD 8.4; p = 0.30). The difference in mean score change between the groups was 12.5 (p = 0.048). The lower mean stress scores in the intervention group were maintained during the trial extension to day 56. The mean stress score for the control group changed significantly during the 28-day extension period (change -8.5, SD 7.6; p < 0.001).

conclusionA biofeedback-based stress management tool may be a simple and effective stress-reduction strategy for physicians.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultBiofeedback, PsychologyChi-Square DistributionEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposurePhysiciansPsychometricsStatistics, NonparametricStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22567069
PMCPMC3345375
OpenAlexW2143944265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.