ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2012
Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors service delivery model task force: a proposal to define models, components, and modes of referral.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating genetic counseling session duration: A scoping review of patient care time, influencing factors, and impact on patient outcomes.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- A qualitative study into the experiences of families affected by developmental disorders seeing the UK NHS Genetics Service; if I had known then what I know now.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Cancer genetic counseling via telegenetics and telephone: A qualitative study exploring the experience of patients and genetic counselors in an Australian cancer genetics context.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Clinical genetic services in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy: current activity and open issues: a mixed-method study.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- The ENGAGE study: evaluation of a conversational virtual agent that provides tailored pre-test genetic education to cancer patients.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Hereditary Cancer Clinics Improve Adherence to NCCN Germline Testing Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2024Article
- Clinical Impact of a Rapid Genetic Testing Model for Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients.The Journal of urology · 2023Article
- Identification of Germline Variants in Patients with Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in Northeast Mexico.Genes · 2023Article
- Mainstreaming germline genetic testing for patients with pancreatic cancer increases uptake.Familial cancer · 2023Article
- IMPACT webinars: Improving Patient Access to genetic Counselling and Testing using webinars-the Alberta experience with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Far and wide: Exploring provider utilization of remote service provision for genome-wide sequencing in Canada.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Sudden shift to remote genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of genetics professionals in Italy.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- 'Steep learning curves' to 'Smooth Sailing': A reappraisal of telegenetics amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- Transitioning to telegenetics in the COVID-19 era: Patient satisfaction with remote genetic counseling in adult neurology.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- Patients' and professionals' perspective of non-in-person visits in hereditary cancer: predictors and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- "I think that a brief conversation from their provider can go a very long way": Patient and provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators of genetic testing after ovarian cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Adaptation and validation of the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale for autism spectrum disorders and related conditions.Journal of genetic counseling · 2021Article
- Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Are Genetic Testing Guidelines a Tool or an Obstacle?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019Article
- Evaluating and improving the implementation of a community-based hereditary cancer screening program.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Service Delivery Model Task Force (SDMTF) was appointed in 2009 by the leadership of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) with a charge to research and assess the capacity of all existing service delivery models to improve access to genetic counseling services in the context of increasing demand for genetic testing and counseling. In approaching this charge, the SDMTF found that there were varying interpretations of what was meant by "service delivery models" and the group held extensive discussions about current practices to arrive at consensus of proposed definitions for current genetic service delivery models, modes of referral and components of service delivery. The major goal of these proposed definitions is to allow for conversations to begin to address the charge to the committee. We propose that current models of service delivery can be defined by: 1) the methods in which genetic counseling services are delivered (In-person, Telephone, Group and Telegenetics), 2) the way they are accessed by patients (Traditional referral, Tandem, Triage, Rescue and Self-referral) and 3) the variable components that depend upon multiple factors unique to each service setting. This report by the SDMTF provides a starting point whereby standardized terminology can be used in future studies that assess the effectiveness of these described models to overcome barriers to access to genetic counseling services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22566244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.