Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22565579›Full record

ReviewJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2012

Research ethics education for community-engaged research: a review and research agenda.

Emily E Anderson, Stephanie Solomon, Elizabeth Heitman, James M DuBois, Celia B Fisher, Rhonda G Kost, Mary Ellen Lawless, Cornelia Ramsey, Bonnie Jones, Alice Ammerman and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. So Useful as a Good Theory? The Practicality Crisis in (Social) Psychological Theory.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emily E AndersonNeiswanger Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. emanderson@lumc.edu
Stephanie Solomon
Elizabeth Heitman
James M DuBois
Celia B Fisher
Rhonda G Kost
Mary Ellen Lawless
Cornelia Ramsey
Bonnie Jones
Alice Ammerman
Lainie Friedman Ross

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
Transforming Translational Science and Education to Benefit Human HealthUL1TR000043 · NCATS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, BARRY · 2012 to 2015
$26.8M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR029879 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MAZZONE, THEODORE · 2009 to 2011
$11.0M
Best Practices in Mental Health Research Ethics Conference SeriesR13MH079690 · NIMH · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI DUBOIS, JAMES M · 2007 to 2010
$190k
Intramural VA CDA 10-019NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000043NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029879NIMH NIH HHS R13 MH079690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement is increasingly becoming an integral part of research. "Community-engaged research" (CEnR) introduces new stakeholders as well as unique challenges to the protection of participants and the integrity of the research process. We--a group of representatives of CTSA-funded institutions and others who share expertise in research ethics and CEnR--have identified gaps in the literature regarding (1) ethical issues unique to CEnR; (2) the particular instructional needs of academic investigators, community research partners, and IRB members; and (3) best practices for teaching research ethics. This paper presents what we know, as well as what we still need to learn, in order to develop quality research ethics educational materials tailored to the full range of stakeholder groups in CEnR.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationResearch DesignResidence CharacteristicsBenchmarkingEthics Committees, ResearchEthics, ResearchHumansResearch Personnel

Identifiers

PMID22565579
PMCPMC3483026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.