Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22565204›Full record

ReviewCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2012

Linking neurogenetics and individual differences in language learning: the dopamine hypothesis.

Patrick C M Wong, Kara Morgan-Short, Marc Ettlinger, Jing Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Science advances · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The role of age and executive function in auditory category learning.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick C M WongRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. pwong@northwestern.edu
Kara Morgan-Short
Marc Ettlinger
Jing Zheng

Funding

Multidisciplinary Clinical and Translational Science (MCTS) Program (UL1)UL1TR000150 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LLOYD-JONES, DONALD M · 2012 to 2013
$10.1M
Behavioral and Neurologic Factors in Speech LearningR01DC008333 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, PATRICK C M · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
DYNAMIC INTERATION AMONG PROTEINS IN HAIR CELLSR01DC011813 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ZHENG, JING · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Preventing hair cell loss by regulating prestin's functionRC1DC010633 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ZHENG, JING · 2009 to 2010
$953k
Genetic Factors in Speech LearningR21DC009652 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, PATRICK C M · 2008 to 2009
$521k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000150NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008333NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC008333NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011813NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC009652NIDCD NIH HHS R21DC009652NIDCD NIH HHS R21DC009652-S1NIDCD NIH HHS RC1 DC010633NIDCD NIH HHS RC1DC010633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fundamental advances in neuroscience have come from investigations into neuroplasticity and learning. These investigations often focus on identifying universal principles across different individuals of the same species. Increasingly, individual differences in learning success have also been observed, such that any seemingly universal principle might only be applicable to a certain extent within a particular learner. One potential source of this variation is individuals' genetic differences. Adult language learning provides a unique opportunity for understanding individual differences and genetic bases of neuroplasticity because of the large individual differences in learning success that have already been documented, and because of the body of empirical work connecting language learning and neurocognition. In this article, we review the literature on the genetic bases of neurocognition, especially studies examining polymorphisms of dopamine (DA)-related genes and procedural learning. This review leads us to hypothesize that there may be an association between DA-related genetic variation and language learning differences. If this hypothesis is supported by future empirical findings we suggest that it may point to neurogenetic markers that allow for language learning to be personalized.

Indexed as

IndividualityLanguage DevelopmentAnimalsDopamineHumansLanguageLearningNeuronal PlasticityDopamine

Identifiers

PMID22565204
PMCPMC3965203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.