Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22565130›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2012

Genome evolution in filamentous plant pathogens: why bigger can be better.

Sylvain Raffaele, Sophien Kamoun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 350 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
350citing papers in PubMed
60.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

350 citing papers in PubMed, 770 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A chromosome-level genome assembly ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome size estimation and evolution trends in Acari.Experimental & applied acarology · 2025
    Article
  18. Deciphering the Molecular Interplay Between RXLR-EncodedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvain RaffaeleThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Sophien Kamoun
Norwich Research Park · GBSainsbury Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many species of fungi and oomycetes are plant pathogens of great economic importance. Over the past 7 years, the genomes of more than 30 of these filamentous plant pathogens have been sequenced, revealing remarkable diversity in genome size and architecture. Whereas the genomes of many parasites and bacterial symbionts have been reduced over time, the genomes of several lineages of filamentous plant pathogens have been shaped by repeat-driven expansions. In these lineages, the genes encoding proteins involved in host interactions are frequently polymorphic and reside within repeat-rich regions of the genome. Here, we review the properties of these adaptable genome regions and the mechanisms underlying their plasticity, and we illustrate cases in which genome plasticity has contributed to the emergence of new virulence traits. We also discuss how genome expansions may have had an impact on the co-evolutionary conflict between these filamentous plant pathogens and their hosts.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, FungalFungiHost-Pathogen InteractionsPlant DiseasesVirulence FactorsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID22565130
OpenAlexW2054562396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.