Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22564871›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2012

Oophorectomy after menopause and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Joanne Kotsopoulos, Jan Lubinski, Henry T Lynch, Charmaine Kim-Sing, Susan Neuhausen, Rochelle Demsky, William D Foulkes, Parviz Ghadirian, Nadine Tung, Peter Ainsworth and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cancers · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Salpingectomy as a means to reduce ovarian cancer risk.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Joanne KotsopoulosWomen's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jan Lubinski
Henry T Lynch
Charmaine Kim-Sing
Susan Neuhausen
Rochelle Demsky
William D Foulkes
Parviz Ghadirian
Nadine Tung
Peter Ainsworth
Leigha Senter
Beth Karlan
Andrea Eisen
Charis Eng
Jeffrey Weitzel
Dawna M Gilchrist
Joanne L Blum
Dana Zakalik
Christian Singer
Taya Fallen
Ophira Ginsburg
Tomasz Huzarski
Ping Sun
Steven A Narod
University of Toronto · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CABC Cancer Agency · CAPomeranian Medical University · PLRegional Cancer Center · US

Funding

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BREAST CANCER--BRCA1 AND BRCA2R01CA074415 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NEUHAUSEN, SUSAN L. · 1998 to 2007
$3.9M
Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Network: A Sustainable Research PartnershipRC4CA153828 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI WEITZEL, JEFFREY N · 2010 to 2010
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074415NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 74415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the effect of the cumulative number of ovulatory cycles and its contributing components on the risk of breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers.

methodsWe conducted a matched case-control study on 2,854 pairs of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the association between the number of ovulatory cycles and various exposures and the risk of breast cancer. Information from a subset of these women enrolled in a prospective cohort study was used to calculate age-specific breast cancer rates.

resultsThe annual risk of breast cancer decreased with the number of ovulatory cycles experienced (ρ = -0.69; P = 0.03). Age at menarche and duration of breastfeeding were inversely related with risk of breast cancer among BRCA1 (P(trend) < 0.0001) but not among BRCA2 (P(trend) ≥ 0.28) mutation carriers. The reduction in breast cancer risk associated with surgical menopause [OR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.40-0.66; P(trend) < 0.0001] was greater than that associated with natural menopause (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-1.07; P(trend) = 0.14). There was a highly significant reduction in breast cancer risk among women who had an oophorectomy after natural menopause (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.54; P = 0.006).

conclusionsThese data challenge the hypothesis that breast cancer risk can be predicted by the lifetime number of ovulatory cycles in women with a BRCA mutation. Both pre- and postmenopausal oophorectomy protect against breast cancer. IMPACT: Understanding the basis for the protective effect of oophorectomy has important implications for chemoprevention.

Indexed as

MenopauseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedMutationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22564871
PMCPMC3593267
OpenAlexW2165800791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.