Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22564676›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2012

Antibacterial activity of statins: a comparative study of atorvastatin, simvastatin, and rosuvastatin.

Majed Masadeh, Nizar Mhaidat, Karem Alzoubi, Sayer Al-Azzam, Ziad Alnasser

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Old drugs, new weapons: current trends in repurposing therapies against antimicrobial resistance.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Therapeutic potential of3 Biotech · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Statins, Allies against Antibiotic Resistance?Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Majed MasadehFaculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan. mmmasadeh@just.edu.jo
Nizar Mhaidat
Karem Alzoubi
Sayer Al-Azzam
Ziad Alnasser
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStatins have several effects beyond their well-known antihyperlipidemic activity, which include immunomodulatory, antioxidative and anticoagulant effects. In this study, we have tested the possible antimicrobial activity of statins against a range of standard bacterial strains and bacterial clinical isolates.

methodsMinimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values were evaluated and compared among three members of the statins drug (atorvastatin, simvastatin, and rosuvastatin).

resultsIt was revealed that statins are able to induce variable degrees of antibacterial activity with atorvastatin, and simvastatin being the more potent than rosuvastatin. Methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-susceptible enterococci (VSE), vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE), acinetobacter baumannii, staphylococcus epidermidis, and enterobacter aerogenes, were more sensitive to both atorvastatin, and simvastatin compared to rosuvastatin. On the other hand, escherichia coli, proteus mirabilis, and enterobacter cloacae were more sensitive to atorvastatin compared to both simvastatin and rosuvastatin. Furthermore, most clinical isolates were less sensitive to statins compared to their corresponding standard strains.

conclusionOur findings might raise the possibility of a potentially important antibacterial class effect for statins especially, atorvastatin and simvastatin.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAtorvastatinDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFluorobenzenesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHeptanoic AcidsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyrimidinesPyrrolesRosuvastatin CalciumSimvastatinSulfonamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAtorvastatinFluorobenzenesHeptanoic AcidsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolesRosuvastatin CalciumSimvastatinSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID22564676
PMCPMC3408379
OpenAlexW2098607778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.