ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2012
Recognition of medication information from discharge summaries using ensembles of classifiers.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Hybrid Deep Learning for Medication-Related Information Extraction From Clinical Texts in French: MedExt Algorithm Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Ensemble method-based extraction of medication and related information from clinical texts.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Ensembles of natural language processing systems for portable phenotyping solutions.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Article
- Identifying risks areas related to medication administrations - text mining analysis using free-text descriptions of incident reports.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Clinical Named Entity Recognition From Chinese Electronic Health Records via Machine Learning Methods.JMIR medical informatics · 2018Article
- Automatic mining of symptom severity from psychiatric evaluation notes.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2018Article
- Modelling and extraction of variability in free-text medication prescriptions from an anonymised primary care electronic medical record research database.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Article
- NOBLE - Flexible concept recognition for large-scale biomedical natural language processing.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Ensembles of NLP Tools for Data Element Extraction from Clinical Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016Article
- Using local lexicalized rules to identify heart disease risk factors in clinical notes.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- A Study of Concept Extraction Across Different Types of Clinical Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015Article
- A Hybrid Approach to Extracting Disorder Mentions from Clinical Notes.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2015Article
- Mission and Sustainability of Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2).EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2014Article
- Learning to recognize phenotype candidates in the auto-immune literature using SVM re-ranking.PloS one · 2013Article
- In response to: Method of electronic health record documentation and quality of primary care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtraction of clinical information such as medications or problems from clinical text is an important task of clinical natural language processing (NLP). Rule-based methods are often used in clinical NLP systems because they are easy to adapt and customize. Recently, supervised machine learning methods have proven to be effective in clinical NLP as well. However, combining different classifiers to further improve the performance of clinical entity recognition systems has not been investigated extensively. Combining classifiers into an ensemble classifier presents both challenges and opportunities to improve performance in such NLP tasks.
methodsWe investigated ensemble classifiers that used different voting strategies to combine outputs from three individual classifiers: a rule-based system, a support vector machine (SVM) based system, and a conditional random field (CRF) based system. Three voting methods were proposed and evaluated using the annotated data sets from the 2009 i2b2 NLP challenge: simple majority, local SVM-based voting, and local CRF-based voting.
resultsEvaluation on 268 manually annotated discharge summaries from the i2b2 challenge showed that the local CRF-based voting method achieved the best F-score of 90.84% (94.11% Precision, 87.81% Recall) for 10-fold cross-validation. We then compared our systems with the first-ranked system in the challenge by using the same training and test sets. Our system based on majority voting achieved a better F-score of 89.65% (93.91% Precision, 85.76% Recall) than the previously reported F-score of 89.19% (93.78% Precision, 85.03% Recall) by the first-ranked system in the challenge.
conclusionsOur experimental results using the 2009 i2b2 challenge datasets showed that ensemble classifiers that combine individual classifiers into a voting system could achieve better performance than a single classifier in recognizing medication information from clinical text. It suggests that simple strategies that can be easily implemented such as majority voting could have the potential to significantly improve clinical entity recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.