ReviewDrugs2012
Octocog alfa, antihaemophilic factor (recombinant), plasma/albumin free method (Advate®): a review of its use in the management of patients with haemophilia A.
Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibitor development, safety and efficacy of AdvateInternational journal of hematology · 2019Trial
- Perioperative safety and hemostatic efficacy of AdvateInternational journal of hematology · 2018Trial
- Inhibitor development, safety, and efficacy of AdvateInternational journal of hematology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Octocog alfa, antihaemophilic factor, plasma/albumin free method (Advate®) is a recombinant, human, full-length coagulation factor VIII that does not contain human- or animal-derived plasma proteins. It is indicated for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes, for perioperative management and for routine prophylaxis in children and adults with haemophilia A. This article reviews the pharmacological properties, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of Advate® in these patients. In previously treated paediatric and adult patients with moderately severe or severe haemophilia A, Advate® administered prophylactically, on demand or during surgery was effective for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in three pivotal, uncontrolled clinical trials. The haemostatic efficacy of Advate® in these trials was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' in most bleeding episodes, with the majority of episodes being managed with one infusion. These findings were supported by pooled analyses of clinical trials and routine clinical practice studies, including the Post-Authorization Safety Study. Additionally, in a comparative study, routine prophylaxis with Advate® administered in a standard regimen or in a pharmacokinetic-tailored regimen was effective for the prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with moderately severe or severe haemophilia A, with no significant difference between the two regimens in terms of efficacy. Moreover, any routine prophylaxis with Advate® was found to be more effective in preventing bleeding episodes than on-demand therapy with Advate®. Advate® was generally well tolerated in clinical trials and postmarketing studies, with the most common treatment-emergent adverse events being pyrexia and headache. Serious adverse events with Advate® therapy are development of high-titre factor VIII inhibitors (usually in previously untreated patients) and hypersensitivity reactions. As expected, the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors (any titre) appeared to be lower in previously treated patients (≤ 1.8%) than in previously untreated patients (≤ 20%). There are no head-to-head comparative trials of Advate® and other factor VIII concentrates. Nevertheless, current evidence indicates that Advate® is an effective option for the management of paediatric and adult patients with haemophilia A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.