Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22563238›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2012

Imiglucerase in the treatment of Gaucher disease: a history and perspective.

Patrick B Deegan, Timothy M Cox

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. FLT201, a novel liver-directed AAV gene therapy candidate for Gaucher disease type 1.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Gaucher disease. Unusual presentation and mini-review.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick B DeeganDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Lysosomal Disorders Unit, Addenbrooke's NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Cambridge, UK. patrick.deegan@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
Timothy M Cox
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific and therapeutic development of imiglucerase (Cerezyme(®)) by the Genzyme Corporation is a paradigm case for a critical examination of current trends in biotechnology. In this article the authors argue that contemporary interest in treatments for rare diseases by major pharmaceutical companies stems in large part from an exception among rarities: the astonishing commercial success of Cerezyme. The fortunes of the Genzyme Corporation, latterly acquired by global giant Sanofi SA, were founded on the evolution of a blockbuster therapy for a single but, as it turns out, propitious ultra-orphan disorder: Gaucher disease.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug CostsDrug DiscoveryDrug IndustryGaucher DiseaseGlucosylceramidaseHealth Services AccessibilityHumansRegistriesGlucosylceramidaseimiglucerasebiopharmaceuticalenzyme therapylysosomal diseasemacrophage targetingmannose lectinultra-orphan

Identifiers

PMID22563238
PMCPMC3340106
OpenAlexW2120139132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.