ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2013
Epidemic models with uncertainty in the reproduction number.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic downscaling and daily nowcasting from influenza surveillance data.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Kinetic models for epidemic dynamics with social heterogeneity.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Control with uncertain data of socially structured compartmental epidemic models.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Article
- Projecting the end of the Zika virus epidemic in Latin America: a modelling analysis.BMC medicine · 2018Article
- Effects of distribution of infection rate on epidemic models.Physical review. E · 2016Article
- Inferring epidemiological dynamics with Bayesian coalescent inference: the merits of deterministic and stochastic models.Genetics · 2015Article
- 4Flu - an individual based simulation tool to study the effects of quadrivalent vaccination on seasonal influenza in Germany.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the first quantities to be estimated at the start of an epidemic is the basic reproduction number, R₀. The progress of an epidemic is sensitive to the value of R₀, hence we need methods for exploring the consequences of uncertainty in the estimate. We begin with an analysis of the SIR model, with R₀ specified by a probability distribution instead of a single value. We derive probability distributions for the prevalence and incidence of infection during the initial exponential phase, the peaks in prevalence and incidence and their timing, and the final size of the epidemic. Then, by expanding the state variables in orthogonal polynomials in uncertainty space, we construct a set of deterministic equations for the distribution of the solution throughout the time-course of the epidemic. The resulting dynamical system need only be solved once to produce a deterministic stochastic solution. The method is illustrated with R₀ specified by uniform, beta and normal distributions. We then apply the method to data from the New Zealand epidemic of H1N1 influenza in 2009. We apply the polynomial expansion method to a Kermack-McKendrick model, to simulate a forecasting system that could be used in real time. The results demonstrate the level of uncertainty when making parameter estimates and projections based on a limited amount of data, as would be the case during the initial stages of an epidemic. In solving both problems we demonstrate how the dynamical system is derived automatically via recurrence relationships, then solved numerically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22562623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.