Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22562468›Full record

ArticleEukaryotic cell2012

Editosome accessory factors KREPB9 and KREPB10 in Trypanosoma brucei.

Melissa Lerch, Jason Carnes, Nathalie Acestor, Xuemin Guo, Achim Schnaufer, Kenneth Stuart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eukaryotic cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep mutational scanning of the RNase III-like domain inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The eIF3 complex ofRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  8. The Architecture of Trypanosoma brucei editosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa LerchSeattle Biomedical Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jason Carnes
Nathalie Acestor
Xuemin Guo
Achim Schnaufer
Kenneth Stuart

Funding

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA OF NORMAL AND MUTANT TRYPANOSOMESR01AI014102 · NIAID · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI KENNETH D STUART · 1985 to 2026
$20.9M
MITOCHONDRIAL DNA OF NORMAL AND MUTANT TRYPANOSOMESR37AI014102 · NIAID · SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STUART, KENNETH D · 1992 to 2001
$971k
Determining the mechanism of tRNA import into the mitochondria of TrypanosomesF32GM083276 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI LERCH, MELISSA L · 2007 to 2008
$104k
NIAID NIH HHS AI014102NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI014102NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI014102NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM083276NIGMS NIH HHS GM083276Wellcome Trust 095831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiprotein complexes, called editosomes, catalyze the uridine insertion and deletion RNA editing that forms translatable mitochondrial mRNAs in kinetoplastid parasites. We have identified here two new U1-like zinc finger proteins that associate with editosomes and have shown that they are related to KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8, and thus we have named them Kinetoplastid RNA Editing Proteins, KREPB9 and KREPB10. They are conserved and syntenic in trypanosomatids although KREPB10 is absent in Trypanosoma vivax and both are absent in Leishmania. Tandem affinity purification (TAP)-tagged KREPB9 and KREPB10 incorporate into ~20S editosomes and/or subcomplexes thereof and preferentially associate with deletion subcomplexes, as do KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8. KREPB10 also associates with editosomes that are isolated via a chimeric endonuclease, KREN1 in KREPB8 RNA interference (RNAi) cells, or MEAT1. The purified complexes have precleaved editing activities and endonuclease cleavage activity that appears to leave a 5' OH on the 3' product. RNAi knockdowns did not affect growth but resulted in relative reductions of both edited and unedited mitochondrial mRNAs. The similarity of KREPB9 and KREPB10 to KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8 suggests they may be accessory factors that affect editing endonuclease activity and as a consequence may affect mitochondrial mRNA stability. KREPB9 and KREPB10, along with KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8, may enable the endonucleases to discriminate among and accurately cleave hundreds of different editing sites and may be involved in the control of differential editing during the life cycle of T. brucei.

Indexed as

RNA EditingMutagenesis, InsertionalProtozoan ProteinsRNA, ProtozoanTrypanosoma brucei bruceiZinc FingersProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID22562468
PMCPMC3416509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.