ArticleDiabetologia2012
Increased susceptibility to hypertensive renal disease in streptozotocin-treated diabetic rats is not modulated by salt intake.
Article in Diabetologia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mitochondria-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species Contribute to Synergistic Interaction of Diabetes and Hypertension in Causing Chronic Kidney Injury.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2024Article
- Changes in Proximal Tubular Reabsorption Modulate Microvascular Regulation via the TGF System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Transient receptor potential cation channel 6 contributes to kidney injury induced by diabetes and hypertension.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2022Article
- Surgical trauma is associated with renal immune cell activation in rats: A microarray study.Physiological reports · 2021Article
- Understanding the Two Faces of Low-Salt Intake.Current hypertension reports · 2017Review
- Renal autoregulation in health and disease.Physiological reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisIn early type 1 diabetes mellitus, renal salt handling is dysregulated, so that the glomerular filtration rate becomes inversely proportional to salt intake. The salt paradox occurs in both humans and rats and, with low salt intake, results in diabetic hyperfiltration. We tested whether increased salt intake could reduce the susceptibility to injury of non-clipped kidneys in diabetic rats with pre-existing Goldblatt hypertension.
methodsMale Long-Evans rats were made hypertensive and half were then made diabetic. Blood glucose was maintained at ~20-25 mmol/l by insulin implants. One half of each received only the salt in normal chow (1% by weight) and the other half received added salt in drinking water to equal 2.7% by weight of food intake. Weekly 24 h blood pressure records were acquired by telemetry during the 4-month experiment.
resultsSystolic blood pressure was not affected by diabetes or increased salt intake, alone or together. Autoregulation was highly efficient in the non-clipped kidney of both intact and diabetic rats. Histological examination showed minor injury in the clipped kidney, which did not differ among groups. The non-clipped kidney showed extensive pressure-dependent glomerular and vascular injury in both intact and diabetic rats. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThe relationship between pressure and injury was shifted toward lower blood pressure in diabetic rats, indicating that diabetes increased the susceptibility of the kidney to injury despite preservation of autoregulation. The increased susceptibility was not affected by high salt intake in the diabetic rats, thus disproving the hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.