Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22561733›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2013

Beyond counts and shapes: studying pathology of dendritic spines in the context of the surrounding neuropil through serial section electron microscopy.

M Kuwajima, J Spacek, K M Harris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Synaptic Odyssey.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M KuwajimaCenter for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
J Spacek
K M Harris
The University of Texas at Austin · USCharles University · CZ

Funding

Synaptic plasticity across the lifespanR01MH095980 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI KRISTEN M HARRIS · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
Spine and Synaptic Plasticity in Mature HippocampusR37NS021184 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 2005 to 2011
$2.2M
Distance-Dependent Structure and Function of Neuronal DendritesR01EB002170 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 2003 to 2010
$2.1M
Synapse growth and elimination in mature CNSR01MH104319 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Distance-Dependent Structure and Function of Neuronal DendritesR01NS074644 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
SPINES SYNAPSES AND THE ONTOGENY OF A MEMORY MECHANISMR01NS021184 · NINDS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 1988 to 2003
$1.4M
ULTRASTRUCTURE &PLASTICITY OF SPINES &THEIR SYNAPSESR23NS021184 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI HARRIS, KRISTEN M · 1985 to 1986
–
NIBIB NIH HHS EB002170NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002170NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095980NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104319NINDS NIH HHS NS021184NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS021184NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074644NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS021184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because dendritic spines are the sites of excitatory synapses, pathological changes in spine morphology should be considered as part of pathological changes in neuronal circuitry in the forms of synaptic connections and connectivity strength. In the past, spine pathology has usually been measured by changes in their number or shape. A more complete understanding of spine pathology requires visualization at the nanometer level to analyze how the changes in number and size affect their presynaptic partners and associated astrocytic processes, as well as organelles and other intracellular structures. Currently, serial section electron microscopy (ssEM) offers the best approach to address this issue because of its ability to image the volume of brain tissue at the nanometer resolution. Renewed interest in ssEM has led to recent technological advances in imaging techniques and improvements in computational tools indispensable for three-dimensional analyses of brain tissue volumes. Here we consider the small but growing literature that has used ssEM analysis to unravel ultrastructural changes in neuropil including dendritic spines. These findings have implications in altered synaptic connectivity and cell biological processes involved in neuropathology, and serve as anatomical substrates for understanding changes in network activity that may underlie clinical symptoms.

Indexed as

BrainDendritic SpinesMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNeuropilSynapses1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine3D3D reconstructionADAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid βATLUMautomatic tape-collecting lathe ultramicrotomeAβCCDcharge-coupled deviceconnectomedelayed nonmatching-to-sampleDNMSDown’s syndromeDSelectron microscopyEMFIB-SEMfocused ion beam-SEMGABAmedium spiny neuronsmesial temporal lobe epilepsyMPTPMSBMSNsMTLEmulti-synaptic boutonneuropilnon-synaptic boutonNSBpathologypostsynaptic densityPSDSASBFSEMscanning electron microscopyscanning transmission electron microscopySEMserial block face SEMserial section electron microscopyspine apparatusssEMSTEMTEMTEMCATEM camera arraythree-dimensionaltransmission electron microscopyultrastructurevesicular glutamate transportervGluTγ-aminobutylic acid

Identifiers

PMID22561733
PMCPMC3535574
OpenAlexW1985621284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.