Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22561489›Full record

ArticleVaccine2012

Contributions of capsule, lipoproteins and duration of colonisation towards the protective immunity of prior Streptococcus pneumoniae nasopharyngeal colonisation.

Jonathan M Cohen, Suneeta Chimalapati, Corné de Vogel, Alex van Belkum, Helen E Baxendale, Jeremy S Brown

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disruption of theVaccines · 2020
    Article
  6. Extracellular Pneumococcal Serine Proteases Affect Nasopharyngeal Colonization.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Intranasal Immunization with the CommensalApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Antibodies Reactive to CommensalFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan M CohenCentre for Respiratory Research, Department of Medicine, UCL, London, United Kingdom. j.cohen@ucl.ac.uk
Suneeta Chimalapati
Corné de Vogel
Alex van Belkum
Helen E Baxendale
Jeremy S Brown
University College London · GBUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0600410Medical Research Council G0700829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live attenuated vaccines have been proposed as a strategy to induce protective immunity against infectious diseases. Recent data have demonstrated that nasopharyngeal colonisation with Streptococcus pneumoniae induces protective immunity against subsequent invasive infection, suggesting nasal vaccination with live attenuated bacteria could be a preventative strategy. However the bacterial factors affecting the strength of this adaptive immune response remain unclear. In a direct comparison with the parent wild-type strain, we found that colonisation with bacteria lacking either capsule or surface lipoproteins led to significantly diminished protection. Immunity after colonisation was not dependent on serum IgG to capsular antigens. Colonisation density and duration was reduced for all the non-protective strains, suggesting that protective immunity maybe related to the extent of nasopharyngeal bacterial exposure. To investigate this hypothesis, we utilised an auxotrophic bacterial Δpab strain where duration of colonisation could be controlled by supply and removal of para-amino-benzoic acid (PABA) to mouse drinking water. Supporting colonisation with the Δpab strain for 5 days with PABA led to a faster serum antibody response compared to colonisation for less than 48 h. This enhanced immunogenicity was associated with a trend towards protection. The data presented here aid our understanding of why only certain live attenuated strains are able to function as effective vaccines, and may be valuable in informing the constituents of future live attenuated vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial CapsulesBacterial ProteinsImmunoglobulin GLipoproteinsMiceNasopharynxPneumococcal VaccinesPneumonia, PneumococcalVaccines, AttenuatedAntibodies, BacterialBacterial ProteinsImmunoglobulin GLipoproteinsPneumococcal VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID22561489
PMCPMC3657162
OpenAlexW1972871458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.