Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22561390›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2012

Efficacy of a smoking quit line in the military: baseline design and analysis.

Phyllis A Richey, Robert C Klesges, Gerald W Talcott, Margaret Debon, Catherine Womack, Fridtjof Thomas, Ann Hryshko-Mullen

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phyllis A RicheyUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA. prichey@uthsc.edu
Robert C Klesges
Gerald W Talcott
Margaret Debon
Catherine Womack
Fridtjof Thomas
Ann Hryshko-Mullen
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USUnited States Air Force · US

Funding

POPULATION WIDE SMOKING CESSATION/PREVENTION PROGRAMR18HL053478 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2012
$5.1M
POPULATION WIDE SMOKING CESSATION/PREVENTION PROGRAMR01HL053478 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 1995 to 1997
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-053478NHLBI NIH HHS R18 HL053478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thirty percent of all military personnel smoke cigarettes. Because of the negative health consequences and their impact on physical fitness, overall health, and military readiness, the Department of Defense has identified the reduction of tobacco use as a priority of US military forces. This study aims to evaluate the one-year efficacy of a proactive versus reactive smoking quit line in the US military with adjunctive nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in both groups. This paper reports on the baseline variables of the first 1000 participants randomized, the design, and proposed analysis of the randomized two-arm clinical trial "Efficacy of a Tobacco Quit Line in the Military". Participants are adult smokers who are Armed Forces Active Duty personnel, retirees, Reservist, National Guard and family member healthcare beneficiaries. All participants are randomized to either the Counselor Initiated (proactive) group, receiving 6 counseling sessions in addition to an 8-week supply of NRT, or the Self-Paced (reactive) group, in which they may call the quit line themselves to receive the same counseling sessions, in addition to a 2-week supply of NRT. The primary outcome measure of the study is self-reported smoking abstinence at 1-year follow-up. Results from this study will be the first to provide evidence for the efficacy of an intensive Counselor Initiated quit line with provided NRT in military personnel and could lead to dissemination throughout the US Air Force, the armed forces population as a whole and ultimately to civilian personnel that do not have ready access to preventive health services.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelAdultAge FactorsCounselingHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSex FactorsSmoking CessationSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsTobacco Use Cessation Devices

Identifiers

PMID22561390
PMCPMC4521417
OpenAlexW2041136893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.