Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22561365›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2012

Extended follow-up confirms early vaccine-enhanced risk of HIV acquisition and demonstrates waning effect over time among participants in a randomized trial of recombinant adenovirus HIV vaccine (Step Study).

Ann Duerr, Yunda Huang, Susan Buchbinder, Robert W Coombs, Jorge Sanchez, Carlos del Rio, Martin Casapia, Steven Santiago, Peter Gilbert, Lawrence Corey and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Viral vector-based influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Efficacy trial of a DNA/rAd5 HIV-1 preventive vaccine.The New England journal of medicine · 2013
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann DuerrFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA. aduerr@hvtn.org
Yunda Huang
Susan Buchbinder
Robert W Coombs
Jorge Sanchez
Carlos del Rio
Martin Casapia
Steven Santiago
Peter Gilbert
Lawrence Corey
Michael N Robertson
Step/HVTN 504 Study Team
University of Washington · USAsociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación · PEAsociación para la Conservación de la Cuenca Amazónica · PECare Resource · USEmory University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · USUnited States Military Academy · USUniversity of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory · US

Funding

LOC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068614 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Dan H. Barouch, Lawrence Corey · 2011 to 2026
$1175.6M
Statistical Methods in HIV Vaccine Efficacy TrialsR37AI054165 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert · 2010 to 2026
$6.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI054165NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Step Study tested whether an adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5)-vectored human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine could prevent HIV acquisition and/or reduce viral load set-point after infection. At the first interim analysis, nonefficacy criteria were met. Vaccinations were halted; participants were unblinded. In post hoc analyses, more HIV infections occurred in vaccinees vs placebo recipients in men who had Ad5-neutralizing antibodies and/or were uncircumcised. Follow-up was extended to assess relative risk of HIV acquisition in vaccinees vs placebo recipients over time.

methodsWe used Cox proportional hazard models for analyses of vaccine effect on HIV acquisition and vaccine effect modifiers, and nonparametric and semiparametric methods for analysis of constancy of relative risk over time.

resultsOne hundred seventy-two of 1836 men were infected. The adjusted vaccinees vs placebo recipients hazard ratio (HR) for all follow-up time was 1.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.92; P= .03). Vaccine effect differed by baseline Ad5 or circumcision status during first 18 months, but neither was significant for all follow-up time. The HR among uncircumcised and/or Ad5-seropositive men waned with time since vaccination. No significant vaccine-associated risk was seen among circumcised, Ad5-negative men (HR, 0.97; P=1.0) over all follow-up time.

conclusionsThe vaccine-associated risk seen in interim analysis was confirmed but waned with time from vaccination.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdenoviridae InfectionsAdultAIDS VaccinesCircumcision, MaleFemaleGenetic VectorsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorTime FactorsVaccines, SyntheticAIDS VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID22561365
PMCPMC3490694
OpenAlexW2116834921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.