Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22560090›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of human genetics2012

A subset-based approach improves power and interpretation for the combined analysis of genetic association studies of heterogeneous traits.

Samsiddhi Bhattacharjee, Preetha Rajaraman, Kevin B Jacobs, William A Wheeler, Beatrice S Melin, Patricia Hartge, GliomaScan Consortium, Meredith Yeager, Charles C Chung, Stephen J Chanock and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of human genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 39 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 39 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 39 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Samsiddhi BhattacharjeeBiostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Preetha Rajaraman
Kevin B Jacobs
William A Wheeler
Beatrice S Melin
Patricia Hartge
GliomaScan Consortium
Meredith Yeager
Charles C Chung
Stephen J Chanock
Nilanjan Chatterjee

Funding

Methods for Epidemiology StudiesZIACP010181 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALBERT, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$34.8M
Vitamin D, Related Genes and Breast Cancer RiskR01CA098661 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ZELENIUCH-JAQUOTTE, ANNE · 2003 to 2013
$9.7M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS R01 CA098661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pooling genome-wide association studies (GWASs) increases power but also poses methodological challenges because studies are often heterogeneous. For example, combining GWASs of related but distinct traits can provide promising directions for the discovery of loci with small but common pleiotropic effects. Classical approaches for meta-analysis or pooled analysis, however, might not be suitable for such analysis because individual variants are likely to be associated with only a subset of the traits or might demonstrate effects in different directions. We propose a method that exhaustively explores subsets of studies for the presence of true association signals that are in either the same direction or possibly opposite directions. An efficient approximation is used for rapid evaluation of p values. We present two illustrative applications, one for a meta-analysis of separate case-control studies of six distinct cancers and another for pooled analysis of a case-control study of glioma, a class of brain tumors that contains heterogeneous subtypes. Both the applications and additional simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed methods offer improved power and more interpretable results when compared to traditional methods for the analysis of heterogeneous traits. The proposed framework has applications beyond genetic association studies.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityPhenotypeCase-Control StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalGene FrequencyGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLogistic ModelsModels, GeneticModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID22560090
PMCPMC3376551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.