ArticleBMC molecular biology2012
Standardized collection of MNase-seq experiments enables unbiased dataset comparisons.
Article in BMC molecular biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Scalable MNase-seq Framework for Reproducible Nucleosome Profiling across Pluripotent Stem Cell and Cardiomyocyte Models.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Circulating Cell-free DNA Fragmentomics Detection and Beyond.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Defining transcription factor nucleosome binding with Pioneer-seq.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Loss of Fbxo45 in AT2 cells leads to insufficient histone supply and initiates lung adenocarcinoma.Cell death and differentiation · 2025Article
- Nucleosome binding by TP53, TP63, and TP73 is determined by the composition, accessibility, and helical orientation of their binding sites.Genome research · 2025Article
- Sir2 and Reb1 antagonistically regulate nucleosome occupancy in subtelomeric X-elements and repress TERRAs by distinct mechanisms.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- ΔNp63 is a pioneer factor that binds inaccessible chromatin and elicits chromatin remodeling.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2021Article
- Absolute nucleosome occupancy map for theGenome research · 2019Article
- High Sensitivity Profiling of Chromatin Structure by MNase-SSP.Cell reports · 2019Article
- Defining TP53 pioneering capabilities with competitive nucleosome binding assays.Genome research · 2019Article
- Helicase/SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase Uls1 interacts with the Holliday junction resolvase Yen1.PloS one · 2019Article
- Understanding nucleosome dynamics and their links to gene expression and DNA replication.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2017Review
- Punctuated chromatin states regulate Plasmodium falciparum antigenic variation at the intron and 2 kb upstream regions.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- MNase titration reveals differences between nucleosome occupancy and chromatin accessibility.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Zelda overcomes the high intrinsic nucleosome barrier at enhancers during Drosophila zygotic genome activation.Genome research · 2015Article
- Nucleosome positioning in yeasts: methods, maps, and mechanisms.Chromosoma · 2015Review
- Iron-responsive chromatin remodelling and MAPK signalling enhance adhesion in Candida albicans.Molecular microbiology · 2014Article
- Toxicogenomics and cancer susceptibility: advances with next-generation sequencing.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2014Review
- Chromatin accessibility: a window into the genome.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2014Review
- Chd1 co-localizes with early transcription elongation factors independently of H3K36 methylation and releases stalled RNA polymerase II at introns.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe organization of eukaryotic DNA into chromatin has a strong influence on the accessibility and regulation of genetic information. The locations and occupancies of a principle component of chromatin, nucleosomes, are typically assayed through use of enzymatic digestion with micrococcal nuclease (MNase). MNase is an endo-exo nuclease that preferentially digests naked DNA and the DNA in linkers between nucleosomes, thus enriching for nucleosome-associated DNA. To determine nucleosome organization genome-wide, DNA remaining from MNase digestion is sequenced using high-throughput sequencing technologies (MNase-seq). Unfortunately, the results of MNase-seq can vary dramatically due to technical differences and this confounds comparisons between MNase-seq experiments, such as examining condition-dependent chromatin organizations.
resultsIn this study we use MNase digestion simulations to demonstrate how MNase-seq signals can vary for different nucleosome configuration when experiments are performed with different extents of MNase digestion. Signal variation in these simulations reveals an important DNA sampling bias that results from a neighborhood effect of MNase digestion techniques. The presence of this neighborhood effect ultimately confounds comparisons between different MNase-seq experiments. To address this issue we present a standardized chromatin preparation which controls for technical variance between MNase-based chromatin preparations and enables the collection of similarly sampled (matched) chromatin populations. Standardized preparation of chromatin includes a normalization step for DNA input into MNase digestions and close matching of the extent of digestion between each chromatin preparation using gel densitometry analysis. The protocol also includes directions for successful pairing with multiplex sequencing reactions.
conclusionsWe validated our method by comparing the experiment-to-experiment variation between biological replicates of chromatin preparations from S. cerevisiae. Results from our matched preparation consistently produced MNase-seq datasets that were more closely correlated than other unstandardized approaches. Additionally, we validated the ability of our approach at enabling accurate downstream comparisons of chromatin structures, by comparing the specificity of detecting Tup1-dependent chromatin remodeling events in comparisons between matched and un-matched wild-type and tup1Δ MNase-seq datasets. Our matched MNase-seq datasets demonstrated a significant reduction in non-specific (technical) differences between experiments and were able to maximize the detection of biologically-relevant (Tup1-dependent) changes in chromatin structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.