Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22559693›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2012

Accuracy of optical spectroscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia without colposcopic tissue information; a step toward automation for low resource settings.

Jose-Miguel Yamal, Getie A Zewdie, Dennis D Cox, E Neely Atkinson, Scott B Cantor, Calum MacAulay, Kalatu Davies, Isaac Adewole, Timon P H Buys, Michele Follen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jose-Miguel YamalThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler, RAS W928, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. Jose-Miguel.Yamal@uth.tmc.edu
Getie A Zewdie
Dennis D Cox
E Neely Atkinson
Scott B Cantor
Calum MacAulay
Kalatu Davies
Isaac Adewole
Timon P H Buys
Michele Follen
BC Cancer Agency · CADrexel University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USRice University · USUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

Technical FeasibilityP01CA082710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GUILLAUD, MARTIAL · 1999 to 2014
$28.7M
Training Program in Biostatistics at UTHSCH-SPHT32GM074902 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DESANTIS, STACIA · 2006 to 2018
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA082710NCI NIH HHS P01-CA-82710-09NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM074902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical spectroscopy has been proposed as an accurate and low-cost alternative for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. We previously published an algorithm using optical spectroscopy as an adjunct to colposcopy and found good accuracy (sensitivity=1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.92 to 1.00], specificity=0.71 [95% CI=0.62 to 0.79]). Those results used measurements taken by expert colposcopists as well as the colposcopy diagnosis. In this study, we trained and tested an algorithm for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (i.e., identifying those patients who had histology reading CIN 2 or worse) that did not include the colposcopic diagnosis. Furthermore, we explored the interaction between spectroscopy and colposcopy, examining the importance of probe placement expertise. The colposcopic diagnosis-independent spectroscopy algorithm had a sensitivity of 0.98 (95% CI=0.89 to 1.00) and a specificity of 0.62 (95% CI=0.52 to 0.71). The difference in the partial area under the ROC curves between spectroscopy with and without the colposcopic diagnosis was statistically significant at the patient level (p=0.05) but not the site level (p=0.13). The results suggest that the device has high accuracy over a wide range of provider accuracy and hence could plausibly be implemented by providers with limited training.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsColposcopyFemaleFiber Optic TechnologyHistocytochemistryHumansLogistic ModelsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrum AnalysisUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID22559693
PMCPMC3380950
OpenAlexW2154348051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.