Trial reportThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2012
Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.
Trial report in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Programming in Children.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2016Trial
- Speech performance in adults with cochlear implants using combined channel deactivation and dynamic current focusing.Hearing research · 2025Article
- Psychoacoustic and electroencephalographic responses to changes in amplitude modulation depth and frequency in relation to speech recognition in cochlear implantees.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Review
- Asymmetric temporal envelope sensitivity: Within- and across-ear envelope comparisons in listeners with bilateral cochlear implants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.Hearing research · 2022Article
- Pleasantness Ratings of Musical Dyads in Cochlear Implant Users.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Review
- Forward Digit Span and Word Familiarity Do Not Correlate With Differences in Speech Recognition in Individuals With Cochlear Implants After Accounting for Auditory Resolution.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Assessing temporal responsiveness of primary stimulated neurons in auditory brainstem and cochlear implant users.Hearing research · 2021Article
- Electrophysiology and genetic testing in the precision medicine of congenital deafness: A review.Journal of otology · 2021Review
- Electrophysiological assessment of temporal envelope processing in cochlear implant users.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Using Spectral Blurring to Assess Effects of Channel Interaction on Speech-in-Noise Perception with Cochlear Implants.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020Article
- Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020Article
- Dendritic Degeneration of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers and Its Impact on the Spiking Pattern Under Regular Conditions and During Cochlear Implant Stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- A Site-Selection Strategy Based on Polarity Sensitivity for Cochlear Implants: Effects on Spectro-Temporal Resolution and Speech Perception.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2019Article
- Development and validation of a spectro-temporal processing test for cochlear-implant listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships with Average Threshold, Gap Detection, and Rate Discrimination.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Article
- Prevalence of Extracochlear Electrodes: Computerized Tomography Scans, Cochlear Implant Maps, and Operative Reports.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify across-site patterns of modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) in subjects with cochlear implants and to determine if removal of sites with the poorest MDTs from speech processor programs would result in improved speech recognition. Five hundred millisecond trains of symmetric-biphasic pulses were modulated sinusoidally at 10 Hz and presented at a rate of 900 pps using monopolar stimulation. Subjects were asked to discriminate a modulated pulse train from an unmodulated pulse train for all electrodes in quiet and in the presence of an interleaved unmodulated masker presented on the adjacent site. Across-site patterns of masked MDTs were then used to construct two 10-channel MAPs such that one MAP consisted of sites with the best masked MDTs and the other MAP consisted of sites with the worst masked MDTs. Subjects' speech recognition skills were compared when they used these two different MAPs. Results showed that MDTs were variable across sites and were elevated in the presence of a masker by various amounts across sites. Better speech recognition was observed when the processor MAP consisted of sites with best masked MDTs, suggesting that temporal modulation sensitivity has important contributions to speech recognition with a cochlear implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.