Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22559222›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2012

Label-free quantitation of protein modifications by pseudo selected reaction monitoring with internal reference peptides.

Stacy D Sherrod, Matthew V Myers, Ming Li, Jeremy S Myers, Kristin L Carpenter, Brendan Maclean, Michael J Maccoss, Daniel C Liebler, Amy-Joan L Ham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein Haptenation and Its Role in Allergy.Chemical research in toxicology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stacy D SherrodJim Ayers Institute of Precancer Detection and Diagnosis and §Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine , Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States.
Matthew V Myers
Ming Li
Jeremy S Myers
Kristin L Carpenter
Brendan Maclean
Michael J Maccoss
Daniel C Liebler
Amy-Joan L Ham
Vanderbilt University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment for CancerU24CA126479 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LIEBLER, DANIEL C · 2006 to 2010
$7.9M
Skyline Targeted Proteomics EnvironmentR01GM103551 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2020
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA126479NCI NIH HHS U24CA126479NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based methods provide powerful tools for the quantitative analysis of modified proteins. We have developed a label-free approach using internal reference peptides (IRP) from the target protein for signal normalization without the need for isotope labeling. Ion-trap mass spectrometry and pseudo-selected reaction monitoring (pSRM) were used to acquire full MS/MS and MS(3) spectra from target peptides. Skyline, a widely used software for SRM experiments, was used for chromatographic ion extraction. Phosphopeptides spiked into a BSA background yielded concentration response curves with high correlation coefficients (typically >0.9) and low coefficients of variation (≤15%) over a 200-fold concentration range. Stable isotope dilution (SID) and IRP methods were compared for quantitation of six site-specific phosphorylations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in epidermal growth factor-stimulated A431 cells with or without the addition of EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and gefitinib. Equivalent responses were observed with both IRP and SID methods, although analyses using the IRP method typically had higher median CVs (22-31%) than SID (10-20%). Analyses using both methods were consistent with immunoblot using site-selective antibodies. The ease of implementation and the suitability for targeted quantitative comparisons make this method suitable for broad application in protein biochemistry.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalAmino Acid SequenceCell Line, TumorHumansMolecular Sequence DataPeptide FragmentsReference StandardsTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID22559222
PMCPMC3368409
OpenAlexW2083847379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.