ArticlePloS one2012
Analysis of adhesion molecules and basement membrane contributions to synaptic adhesion at the Drosophila embryonic NMJ.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Loss of the extracellular matrix protein Perlecan disrupts axonal and synaptic stability duringeLife · 2023Article
- The matricellular protein Drosophila Cellular Communication Network Factor is required for synaptic transmission and female fertility.Genetics · 2023Article
- The ECM: To Scaffold, or Not to Scaffold, That Is the Question.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Mucin-TypeFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2021Article
- Neurexin and Neuroligins Maintain the Balance of Ghost and Satellite Boutons at theFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2020Article
- The model of local axon homeostasis - explaining the role and regulation of microtubule bundles in axon maintenance and pathology.Neural development · 2019Review
- Tenectin recruits integrin to stabilize bouton architecture and regulate vesicle release at theeLife · 2018Article
- Glucuronylated core 1 glycans are required for precise localization of neuromuscular junctions and normal formation of basement membranes on Drosophila muscles.Developmental biology · 2018Article
- Multiple roles of integrin-α3 at the neuromuscular junction.Journal of cell science · 2017Article
- Adducin at the Neuromuscular Junction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Hanging on for Dear Life.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016Review
- Mechanisms controlling neuromuscular junction stability.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015Review
- Morphological identification and development of neurite in Drosophila ventral nerve cord neuropil.PloS one · 2014Article
- The intricate relationship between microtubules and their associated motor proteins during axon growth and maintenance.Neural development · 2013Review
- Three-dimensional imaging of Drosophila motor synapses reveals ultrastructural organizational patterns.Journal of neurogeneticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Synapse formation and maintenance crucially underlie brain function in health and disease. Both processes are believed to depend on cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). Many different classes of CAMs localise to synapses, including cadherins, protocadherins, neuroligins, neurexins, integrins, and immunoglobulin adhesion proteins, and further contributions come from the extracellular matrix and its receptors. Most of these factors have been scrutinised by loss-of-function analyses in animal models. However, which adhesion factors establish the essential physical links across synaptic clefts and allow the assembly of synaptic machineries at the contact site in vivo is still unclear. To investigate these key questions, we have used the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) of Drosophila embryos as a genetically amenable model synapse. Our ultrastructural analyses of NMJs lacking different classes of CAMs revealed that loss of all neurexins, all classical cadherins or all glutamate receptors, as well as combinations between these or with a Laminin deficiency, failed to reveal structural phenotypes. These results are compatible with a view that these CAMs might have no structural role at this model synapse. However, we consider it far more likely that they operate in a redundant or well buffered context. We propose a model based on a multi-adaptor principle to explain this phenomenon. Furthermore, we report a new CAM-independent adhesion mechanism that involves the basement membranes (BM) covering neuromuscular terminals. Thus, motorneuronal terminals show strong partial detachment of the junction when BM-to-cell surface attachment is impaired by removing Laminin A, or when BMs lose their structural integrity upon loss of type IV collagens. We conclude that BMs are essential to tie embryonic motorneuronal terminals to the muscle surface, lending CAM-independent structural support to their adhesion. Therefore, future developmental studies of these synaptic junctions in Drosophila need to consider the important contribution made by BM-dependent mechanisms, in addition to CAM-dependent adhesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.