Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22558307›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Expression patterns of Anaplasma marginale Msp2 variants change in response to growth in cattle, and tick cells versus mammalian cells.

Adela S Oliva Chávez, Roderick F Felsheim, Timothy J Kurtti, Pei-Shin Ku, Kelly A Brayton, Ulrike G Munderloh

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Global Transcription Profiles ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  4. Segmental Variation in a DuplicatedInfection and immunity · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adela S Oliva ChávezDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA. chave028@umn.edu
Roderick F Felsheim
Timothy J Kurtti
Pei-Shin Ku
Kelly A Brayton
Ulrike G Munderloh
University of Minnesota · USWashington State University · USInstitute of Entomology · CZ

Funding

Tick-Mammal Interface of Human Granulocytic AnaplasmosisR01AI042792 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MUNDERLOH, ULRIKE GERTRUD · 2005 to 2020
$8.7M
NIAID NIH HHS 5R01AI042792-12NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI042792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigenic variation of major surface proteins is considered an immune-evasive maneuver used by pathogens as divergent as bacteria and protozoa. Likewise, major surface protein 2 (Msp2) of the tick-borne pathogen, Anaplasma marginale, is thought to be involved in antigenic variation to evade the mammalian host immune response. However, this dynamic process also works in the tick vector in the absence of immune selection pressure. We examined Msp2 variants expressed during infection of four tick and two mammalian cell-lines to determine if the presence of certain variants correlated with specific host cell types. Anaplasma marginale colonies differed in their development and appearance in each of the cell lines (P<0.001). Using Western blots probed with two Msp2-monospecific and one Msp2-monoclonal antibodies, we detected expression of variants with differences in molecular weight. Immunofluorescence-assay revealed that specific antibodies bound from 25 to 60% of colonies, depending on the host cell-line (P<0.001). Molecular analysis of cloned variant-encoding genes demonstrated expression of different predominant variants in tick (V1) and mammalian (V2) cell-lines. Analysis of the putative secondary structure of the variants revealed a change in structure when A. marginale was transferred from one cell-type to another, suggesting that the expression of particular Msp2 variants depended on the cell-type (tick or mammalian) in which A. marginale developed. Similarly, analysis of the putative secondary structure of over 200 Msp2 variants from ticks, blood samples, and other mammalian cells available in GenBank showed the predominance of a specific structure during infection of a host type (tick versus blood sample), demonstrating that selection of a possible structure also occurred in vivo. The selection of a specific structure in surface proteins may indicate that Msp2 fulfils an important role in infection and adaptation to diverse host systems. Supplemental Abstract in Spanish (File S1) is provided.

Indexed as

AllelesAmino Acid SequenceAnaplasma marginaleAnaplasmosisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigenic VariationAntigens, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCattleCell LineColony Count, MicrobialComputational BiologyMammalsMolecular Sequence DataProtein Structure, SecondaryAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial Outer Membrane Proteinsmsp2 protein, Anaplasma marginale

Identifiers

PMID22558307
PMCPMC3338850
OpenAlexW1971033663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.