Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22556434›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2012

The census of India and the mentally ill.

Alok Sarin, Sanjeev Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alok SarinConsultant Psychiatrist, Sitaram Bhartia Institute, and Fellow, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, Teen Murti House, New Delhi, India.
Sanjeev Jain

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CONTEXT/

backgroundEpidemiological data have long been considered essential for documenting incidence of disability and planning services. India has been conducting census operations for a long time, and this information may be relevant in the current context.

aimsTo document the prevalence of insanity, and discussions about treatment and disability arising out of mental illness in India (1850-1950). SETTINGS AND

designThe material used was located at the British Library and the Wellcome Library, London; the Teen Murti Library, Delhi, and web-based archives. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe have retrieved and summarized the coverage of psychiatric illness in previous census reports from the 19(th) and 20(th) century. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: None, this relies upon historical archives and documents. RESULTS AND

conclusionsDifferences in incidence and prevalence of insanity, as well as biological and psycho-social factors in the causation, and outcomes, of mental illness are all discussed in these census reports. Comparisons are often drawn to other countries and cultures, and impressions drawn about these differences and similarities. Similar concerns persist to this day. Disabilities and mental illness were not enumerated since the census of 1941 and have been restored only recently, and this lacuna has hampered planning in the post-Independence era. As we debate policy and plan interventions using contemporary census data, it may be useful to remind ourselves of the issues, then and now.

Indexed as

censusdisabilityEpidemiologyhealth planninghistorypsychiatric illness

Identifiers

PMID22556434
PMCPMC3339215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.