Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22556371›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

Utilizing RNA-Seq data for de novo coexpression network inference.

Ovidiu D Iancu, Sunita Kawane, Daniel Bottomly, Robert Searles, Robert Hitzemann, Shannon McWeeney

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Modern Approaches for Transcriptome Analyses in Plants.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ovidiu D IancuDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA. iancuo@ohsu.edu
Sunita Kawane
Daniel Bottomly
Robert Searles
Robert Hitzemann
Shannon McWeeney

Funding

OREGON CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024140 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2006 to 2011
$61.1M
Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Suzanne S. Fei · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000128 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLISON, DAVID H · 2012 to 2015
$28.7M
THERMAL AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION DURING WITHDRAWALP50AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 1996 to 2005
$10.7M
Neurocircuitry Mapping and Genotyping CoreU01AA013484 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HITZEMANN, ROBERT J. · 2001 to 2021
$6.2M
GENETIC VULNERABILITY TO DRUGS OF ABUSER01DA005228 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BUCK, KARI J · 1989 to 2015
$4.6M
The Role of Mpdz in Ethanol Withdrawal and Genetically Correlated BehaviorsR01AA011114 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BUCK, KARI J · 2000 to 2020
$4.3M
MAPPING THE GENES FOR NEUROLEPTIC RESPONSER01MH051372 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI HITZEMANN, ROBERT J. · 1995 to 2014
$4.0M
ETHANOL WITHDRAWAL QTLS AND CANDIDATE GENESR29AA011114 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BUCK, KARI J · 1997 to 1999
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000128NCI NIH HHS 5P30CA069533-13NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533NCRR NIH HHS 5UL1RR024140NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024140NIAAA NIH HHS AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS AA011114NIAAA NIH HHS AA013484NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011114NIAAA NIH HHS R29 AA011114NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013484NIDA NIH HHS DA005228NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA005228NIMH NIH HHS MH051372NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH051372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationRNA-Seq experiments have shown great potential for transcriptome profiling. While sequencing increases the level of biological detail, integrative data analysis is also important. One avenue is the construction of coexpression networks. Because the capacity of RNA-Seq data for network construction has not been previously evaluated, we constructed a coexpression network using striatal samples, derived its network properties and compared it with microarray-based networks.

resultsThe RNA-Seq coexpression network displayed scale-free, hierarchical network structure. We detected transcripts groups (modules) with correlated profiles; modules overlap distinct ontology categories. Neuroanatomical data from the Allen Brain Atlas reveal several modules with spatial colocalization. The network was compared with microarray-derived networks; correlations from RNA-Seq data were higher, likely because greater sensitivity and dynamic range. Higher correlations result in higher network connectivity, heterogeneity and centrality. For transcripts present across platforms, network structure appeared largely preserved. From this study, we present the first RNA-Seq data de novo network inference.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBAOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNASequence Analysis, RNARNA

Identifiers

PMID22556371
PMCPMC3493127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.