Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22555577›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2012

Differences in CT perfusion summary maps for patients with acute ischemic stroke generated by 2 software packages.

F Fahmi, H A Marquering, G J Streekstra, L F M Beenen, B K Velthuis, E VanBavel, C B Majoie

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Patient selection for mechanical thrombectomy.Clinical neuroradiology · 2014
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F FahmiDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. f.fahmi@amc.uva.nl
H A Marquering
G J Streekstra
L F M Beenen
B K Velthuis
E VanBavel
C B Majoie
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAlthough CT perfusion is a promising tool to support treatment decisions for patients with acute ischemic stroke, it still lacks a standardized method for CTP analysis. The purpose of this study was to assess the variability of the area of infarct core and penumbra as presented in summary maps produced by 2 different software packages. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-one CTP image datasets of 26 consecutive patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke were retrospectively evaluated. Identical image datasets were analyzed by using 2 different commercially available CTP analysis software packages, each representing a mainstream of widely used algorithms: delay-sensitive and delay-insensitive. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to evaluate the level of agreement between the 2 methods in determining the area of infarct core and penumbra area in the summary maps.

resultsThere was a statistically significant difference in infarct core area (-23.6 ± 25.6 cm(2)) and penumbra area (15.8 ± 25.3 cm(2)) between the 2 software packages. For all the areas presented in the summary maps, the Bland-Altman interval limit of agreement was larger than 100 cm(2).

conclusionsThe infarct core and penumbra area of CTP summary maps generated by 2 commonly used software packages were significantly different, emphasizing the need for standardization and validation of CTP analysis before it can be applied to patient management in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaCerebral AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificitySoftware ValidationStroke

Identifiers

PMID22555577
PMCPMC7965595
OpenAlexW2328125976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.