Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22555466›Full record

ReviewGut microbes

Models for the study of Clostridium difficile infection.

Emma L Best, Jane Freeman, Mark H Wilcox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phase variable colony morphotypes ofInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  3. Circadian Behavioral and Bioluminescence Rhythms in theJournal of biological rhythms · 2026
    Article
  4. Phase variable colony morphotypes ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clostridioides difficile Infection in Animals.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The state of play of rodent models for the study ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Reviewing theMicroorganisms · 2024
    Review
  18. Immunization Strategies Against Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Predicting clinical trial success forFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024
    Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma L BestLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Microbiology Department, Old Medical School, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK. emma.best@leedsth.nhs.uk
Jane Freeman
Mark H Wilcox

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of Clostridium difficile infection (C. difficile) have been used extensively for Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) research. The hamster model of C. difficile infection has been most extensively employed for the study of C. difficile and this has been used in many different areas of research, including the induction of C. difficile, the testing of new treatments, population dynamics and characterization of virulence. Investigations using in vitro models for C. difficile introduced the concept of colonization resistance, evaluated the role of antibiotics in C. difficile development, explored population dynamics and have been useful in the evaluation of C. difficile treatments. Experiments using models have major advantages over clinical studies and have been indispensible in furthering C. difficile research. It is important for future study programs to carefully consider the approach to use and therefore be better placed to inform the design and interpretation of clinical studies.

Indexed as

Cytological TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsCell LineClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID22555466
PMCPMC3370947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.