Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22555001›Full record

ArticleAcademic radiology2012

Systems for lung volume standardization during static and dynamic MDCT-based quantitative assessment of pulmonary structure and function.

Matthew K Fuld, Randall W Grout, Junfeng Guo, John H Morgan, Eric A Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. SPIROMICS Protocol for Multicenter Quantitative Computed Tomography to Phenotype the Lungs.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Progress in Imaging COPD, 2004 - 2014.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew K FuldDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52241, USA.
Randall W Grout
Junfeng Guo
John H Morgan
Eric A Hoffman
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Image and Model Based Analysis of Lung DiseasesR01HL064368 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOFFMAN, ERIC ALFRED · 1999 to 2009
$15.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL064368NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL-064368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE AND

objectivesMultidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) has emerged as a tool for quantitative assessment of parenchymal destruction, air trapping (density metrics), and airway remodeling (metrics relating airway wall and lumen geometry) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Critical to the accuracy and interpretability of these MDCT-derived metrics is the assurance that the lungs are scanned during a breathhold at a standardized volume. MATERIALS AND

methodsA computer monitored turbine-based flow meter system was developed to control patient breathholds and facilitate static imaging at fixed percentages of the vital capacity. Because of calibration challenges with gas density changes during multibreath xenon CT, an alternative system was required. The design incorporated dual rolling seal pistons. Both systems were tested in a laboratory environment and human subject trials.

resultsThe turbine-based system successfully controlled lung volumes in 32/37 subjects, having a linear relationship for CT measured air volume between repeated scans: for all scans, the mean and confidence interval of the differences (scan1-scan2) was -9 mL (-169, 151); for total lung capacity alone 6 mL (-164, 177); for functional residual capacity alone, -23 mL (-172, 126). The dual-piston system successfully controlled lung volume in 31/41 subjects. Study failures related largely to subject noncompliance with verbal instruction and gas leaks around the mouthpiece.

conclusionWe demonstrate the successful use of a turbine-based system for static lung volume control and demonstrate its inadequacies for dynamic xenon CT studies. Implementation of a dual-rolling seal spirometer has been shown to adequately control lung volume for multibreath wash-in xenon CT studies. These systems coupled with proper patient coaching provide the tools for the use of CT to quantitate regional lung structure and function. The wash-in xenon CT method for assessing regional lung function, although not necessarily practical for routine clinical studies, provides for a dynamic protocol against which newly emerging single breath, dual-energy xenon CT measures can be validated.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFeedbackHumansLungLung Volume MeasurementsReproducibility of ResultsRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory MechanicsSensitivity and SpecificityTidal VolumeTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22555001
PMCPMC3825680
OpenAlexW2047271804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.