Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22554788›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2012

Directly e-mailing authors of newly published papers encourages community curation.

Stephanie M Bunt, Gary B Grumbling, Helen I Field, Steven J Marygold, Nicholas H Brown, Gillian H Millburn, FlyBase Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Virtual Fly Brain-An interactive atlas of theFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  4. A roadmap for the functional annotation of protein families: a community perspective.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Building a pipeline to solicit expert knowledge from the community to aid gene summary curation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. FlyBase at 25: looking to the future.Nucleic acids research · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Crowd-sourcing and author submission as alternatives to professional curation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Using FlyBase, a Database of Drosophila Genes and Genomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. tagtog: interactive and text-mining-assisted annotation of gene mentions in PLOS full-text articles.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie M BuntFlyBase, Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.
Gary B Grumbling
Helen I Field
Steven J Marygold
Nicholas H Brown
Gillian H Millburn
FlyBase Consortium

Funding

FLYBASE: A DROSOPHILA RELATIONAL DATABASEP41HG000739 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI GELBART, WILLIAM MARTIN · 1992 to 2014
$56.6M
UNM Initiative to Maximize Student Diversity (IMSD)R25GM060201 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI WERNER-WASHBURNE, MARGRET C. · 2000 to 2017
$9.9M
Medical Research Council G1000968NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG000739NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM060201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the data within Model Organism Databases (MODs) comes from manual curation of the primary research literature. Given limited funding and an increasing density of published material, a significant challenge facing all MODs is how to efficiently and effectively prioritize the most relevant research papers for detailed curation. Here, we report recent improvements to the triaging process used by FlyBase. We describe an automated method to directly e-mail corresponding authors of new papers, requesting that they list the genes studied and indicate ('flag') the types of data described in the paper using an online tool. Based on the author-assigned flags, papers are then prioritized for detailed curation and channelled to appropriate curator teams for full data extraction. The overall response rate has been 44% and the flagging of data types by authors is sufficiently accurate for effective prioritization of papers. In summary, we have established a sustainable community curation program, with the result that FlyBase curators now spend less time triaging and can devote more effort to the specialized task of detailed data extraction. Database URL: http://flybase.org/

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsDatabases, FactualElectronic MailData MiningHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationPeriodicals as Topic

Identifiers

PMID22554788
PMCPMC3342516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.