Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22554203›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2012

Efficacy and safety of artemisinin-naphthoquine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in adult patients with uncomplicated malaria: a multi-centre study in Indonesia.

Emiliana Tjitra, Armedy R Hasugian, Hadjar Siswantoro, Budi Prasetyorini, Riyanti Ekowatiningsih, Endah A Yusnita, Telly Purnamasari, Srilaning Driyah, Ervi Salwati, Nurhayati and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Recent advances in malaria drug discovery.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emiliana TjitraNational Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia. emilt@litbang.depkes.go.id
Armedy R Hasugian
Hadjar Siswantoro
Budi Prasetyorini
Riyanti Ekowatiningsih
Endah A Yusnita
Telly Purnamasari
Srilaning Driyah
Ervi Salwati
Nurhayati
Eni Yuwarni
Lidwina Januar
Joseph Labora
Bambang Wijayanto
Fajar Amansyah
Tersila A D Dedang
Asep Purnama
Trihono
Ministry of Health · IDUniversitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA practical and simple regimen for all malaria species is needed towards malaria elimination in Indonesia. It is worth to compare the efficacy and safety of a single dose of artemisinin-naphthoquine (AN) with a three-day regimen of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP), the existing programme drug, in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic malaria.

methodsThis is a phase III, randomized, open label using sealed envelopes, multi-centre, comparative study between a single dose of AN and a three-day dose of DHP in Jayapura and Maumere. The modified WHO inclusion and exclusion criteria for efficacy study were used in this trial. A total of 401 eligible adult malaria subjects were hospitalized for three days and randomly treated with AN four tablets single dose on day 0 or DHP three to four tablets single daily dose for three days, and followed for 42 days for physical examination, thick and thin smears microscopy, and other necessary tests. The efficacy of drug was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) uncorrected and corrected.

resultsThere were 153 Plasmodium falciparum, 158 Plasmodium vivax and 90 P. falciparum/P. vivax malaria. Mean of fever clearance times were similar, 13.0 ± 10.3 hours in AN and 11.3 ± 7.3 hours in DHP groups. The mean of parasite clearance times were longer in AN compared with DHP (28.0 ± 11.7 hours vs 25.5 ± 12.2 hours, p = 0.04). There were only 12 PCR-corrected P. falciparum late treatment failures: seven in AN and five in DHP groups. The PCR uncorrected and corrected on day -42 of adequate clinical and parasitological responses for treatment of any malaria were 93.7% (95% Cl: 90.3-97.2) and 96.3% (95% Cl: 93.6-99.0) in AN, 96.3% (95% Cl: 93.5-99.0) and 97.3% (95% Cl: 95.0-99.6) in DHP groups. Few and mild adverse events were reported. All the abnormal haematology and blood chemistry values had no clinical abnormality.

conclusionAN and DHP are confirmed very effective, safe and tolerate for treatment of any malaria. Both drugs are promising for multiple first-line therapy policies in Indonesia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntimalarialsArtemisininsDNA, ProtozoanFemaleHumansIndonesiaMalariaMaleMiddle AgedNaphthoquinonesParasitemiaPiperazinesPolymerase Chain ReactionAntimalarialsartemisinin-naphthoquine combinationArtemisininsartenimolDNA, ProtozoanNaphthoquinonespiperaquinePiperazinesQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID22554203
PMCPMC3464686
OpenAlexW2156872999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.