Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22554166›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2012

Study protocol: the Back Pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) registry.

Jeffrey G Jarvik, Bryan A Comstock, Brian W Bresnahan, Srdjan S Nedeljkovic, David R Nerenz, Zoya Bauer, Andrew L Avins, Kathryn James, Judith A Turner, Patrick Heagerty and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01776242 (Back Pain Outcomes Using Longitudinal Data), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01776242 completednot on this map

Back Pain Outcomes Using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) Registry and Repository

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2010 to 2013Enrolled5,239ConditionsLow Back Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Impact of IT-enabled intervention on MRI use for back pain.The American journal of medicine · 2014
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. A two-stage super learner for healthcare expenditures.Health services & outcomes research methodology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patient registry.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey G JarvikDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. jarvikj@u.washington.edu
Bryan A Comstock
Brian W Bresnahan
Srdjan S Nedeljkovic
David R Nerenz
Zoya Bauer
Andrew L Avins
Kathryn James
Judith A Turner
Patrick Heagerty
Larry Kessler
Janna L Friedly
Sean D Sullivan
Richard A Deyo
University of Washington · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHenry Ford Hospital · USKaiser Permanente · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Back pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD)R01HS019222 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JARVIK, JEFFREY G · 2010 to 2010
$9.9M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS019222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBack pain is one of the most important causes of functional limitation, disability, and utilization of health care resources for adults of all ages, but especially among older adults. Despite the high prevalence of back pain in this population, important questions remain unanswered regarding the comparative effectiveness of commonly used diagnostic tests and treatments in the elderly. The overall goal of the Back pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) project is to establish a rich, sustainable registry to describe the natural history and evaluate prospectively the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of interventions for patients 65 and older with back pain. METHODS/

designBOLD is enrolling 5,000 patients ≥ 65 years old who present to a primary care physician with a new episode of back pain. We are recruiting study participants from three integrated health systems (Kaiser-Permanente Northern California, Henry Ford Health System in Detroit and Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates/ Harvard Pilgrim Health Care in Boston). Registry patients complete validated, standardized measures of pain, back pain-related disability, and health-related quality of life at enrollment and 3, 6 and 12 months later. We also have available for analysis the clinical and administrative data in the participating health systems' electronic medical records. Using registry data, we will conduct an observational cohort study of early imaging compared to no early imaging among patients with new episodes of back pain. The aims are to: 1) identify predictors of early imaging and; 2) compare pain, functional outcomes, diagnostic testing and treatment utilization of patients who receive early imaging versus patients who do not receive early imaging. In terms of predictors, we will examine patient factors as well as physician factors. DISCUSSION: By establishing the BOLD registry, we are creating a resource that contains patient-reported outcome measures as well as electronic medical record data for elderly patients with back pain. The richness of our data will allow better matching for comparative effectiveness studies than is currently possible with existing datasets. BOLD will enrich the existing knowledge base regarding back pain in the elderly to help clinicians and patients make informed, evidence-based decisions regarding their care.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareRegistriesAgedClinical ProtocolsCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisDisability EvaluationEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22554166
PMCPMC3403933
OpenAlexW2153249628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.