Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22554090›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2013

Neurobiological narratives: experiences of mood disorder through the lens of neuroimaging.

Daniel Z Buchman, Emily L Borgelt, Louise Whiteley, Judy Illes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPersonal Narrative
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The social life of the brain: Neuroscience in society.Current sociology. La Sociologie contemporaine · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Addiction and the brain-disease fallacy.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Neuroimaging in mental health care: voices in translation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Z BuchmanNational Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada.
Emily L Borgelt
Louise Whiteley
Judy Illes
NeuroDevNet · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Advanced Neuroimaging: Ethical, Legal, and Social IssuesR01MH084282 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI ILLES, JUDY · 2008 to 2011
$680k
NIMH NIH HHS MH 9R01MH84282-04A1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084282Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 093837 ⁄Z⁄ 10 ⁄ Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many scientists, healthcare providers, policymakers and patients are awaiting in anticipation the application of biomedical technologies such as functional neuroimaging for the prediction, diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. The potential efficacy of such applications is controversial, and functional neuroimaging is not yet routinely used in psychiatric clinics. However, commercial ventures and enthusiastic reporting indicate a pressing need to engage with the social and ethical issues raised by clinical translation. There has been little investigation of how individuals living with mental illness view functional neuroimaging, or of the potential psychological impacts of its clinical use. We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with adults diagnosed with major depression or bipolar disorder, probing their experiences with mental health care and their perspectives on the prospect of receiving neuroimaging for prediction, diagnosis and planning treatment. The participants discussed the potential role of neuroimages in (i) mitigating stigma; (ii) supporting morally loaded explanations of mental illness due to an imbalance of brain chemistry; (iii) legitimising psychiatric symptoms, which may have previously been de-legitimised since they lacked objective representation, through objective representations of disorder; and (iv) reifying DSM-IV-TR disorder categories and links to identity. We discuss these anticipated outcomes in the context of participant lived experience and attitudes to biologisation of mental illness, and argue for bringing these voices into upstream ethics discussion.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingAdultBipolar DisorderBritish ColumbiaDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSelf ReportSocial PerceptionSocial StigmaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22554090
PMCPMC3414674
OpenAlexW1537307153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.