Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22554041›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of managed care2012

Primary care physicians' experiences with case finding for practice-based care management.

Tobias Freund, Michel Wensing, Stefan Geissler, Frank Peters-Klimm, Cornelia Mahler, Cynthia M Boyd, Joachim Szecsenyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of managed care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emergency admission risk stratification tools in UK primary care: a cross-sectional survey of availability and use.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tobias FreundDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. tobias.freund@med.uniheidelberg.de
Michel Wensing
Stefan Geissler
Frank Peters-Klimm
Cornelia Mahler
Cynthia M Boyd
Joachim Szecsenyi

Funding

Treatment Burden in Older Adults with Diabetes and MultimorbidityK23AG032910 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2009 to 2013
$533k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG032910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe identification of patients most likely to benefit from care management programs-case finding-is a crucial determinant of their effectiveness regarding improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Until now, research has mainly focused on claims data-based case finding. This study aimed to explore how primary care physicians (PCPs) select patients for practice based care management and how risk prediction may complement their case finding. STUDY

designQualitative study.

methodsWe performed 12 semi-structured interviews with PCPs from 10 small- to middle-sized primary care practices in Germany. The interviews focused on their criteria for selecting patients as potential participants in an on-site care management program and how PCPs evaluate claims data-based risk prediction as a case-finding tool. All interviews were transcribed verbatim. We performed qualitative content analysis using the ATLAS.ti software.

resultsThree major categories emerged from the physicians interviewed: 1) the physicians' interpretation of the program's eligibility criteria, 2) physician-related criteria, and 3) patient-related criteria. The physician-related criteria included "sympathy/aversion" and "knowing the patient." Patient-related criteria concerned care sensitivity in terms of "willingness to participate," "ability to participate (eg, sufficient language skills, cognitive status)," and "manageable care needs." PCPs believed that their case finding could be supported by additional information from claims data-based risk prediction.

conclusionsCase finding for care management programs in primary care may benefit from a structured approach combining clinical judgment by PCPs and claims data-based risk modeling. However, further research is needed to identify the optimal case-finding strategy for practice based care management.

Indexed as

Case ManagementPatient SelectionPhysiciansPrimary Health CareAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleForecastingGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID22554041
PMCPMC3422074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.