Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22553263›Full record

SynthesisChest2012

Allergen immunotherapy in allergic respiratory diseases: from mechanisms to meta-analyses.

Ravi K Viswanathan, William W Busse

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chest, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Allergens in Atopic Dermatitis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Phenotypes and Endotypes in Asthma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The effect of a new communication template on anticipated willingness to initiate or resume allergen immunotherapy: an internet-based patient survey.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Severe asthma: an expanding and mounting clinical challenge.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2013
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ravi K ViswanathanDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
William W BusseDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. Electronic address: wwb@medicine.wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Wisconsin Allergy Research Training (WISCART) ProgramT32AI007635 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI James E. Gern, DANIEL J JACKSON · 2000 to 2026
$6.5M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) involves the repeated administration of allergenic extracts to atopic individuals over a period of 3 to 5 years either subcutaneously (SCIT) or sublingually (SLIT) for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases, including asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). In studies, SCIT and SLIT have been shown to improve existing symptoms of asthma and AR and to also have the capability to cause disease-modifying changes of the underlying atopic condition so as to prevent new allergic sensitization as well as arrest progression of AR to asthma. Recent evidence suggests that immunotherapy brings about these effects through actions that use T-regulatory cells and blocking antibodies such as IgG(4) and IgA(2,) which can then result in an "immune deviation" from a T-helper (Th) 2 cell pattern to a Th1 cell pattern. Numerous meta-analyses and studies have been performed to evaluate the existing data among these studies, with the consensus recommendation favoring the use of immunotherapy because of its potential to modify existing diseases. Significant adverse reactions can occur with immunotherapy, including anaphylaxis and, very rarely, death. A primary factor in considering SIT is its potential to provide long-lasting effects that are able to be sustained well after its discontinuation. Given the significant burden these allergic diseases impose on the health-care system, SIT appears to be a cost-effective adjunctive treatment in modifying the existing disease state.

Indexed as

Administration, SublingualAllergensDesensitization, ImmunologicEpitopesFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjections, SubcutaneousRespiratory HypersensitivityTreatment OutcomeAllergensEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID22553263
PMCPMC4694090
OpenAlexW2025046672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.