Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22552917›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2012

Graph spectral analysis of protein interaction network evolution.

Thomas Thorne, Michael P H Stumpf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rare event ABC-SMCStatistics and computing · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A nonparametric significance test for sampled networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas ThorneCentre of Integrative Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, Division of Molecular Biosciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. thomas.thorne@imperial.ac.uk
Michael P H Stumpf

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F005210/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F005210/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F013566/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an analysis of protein interaction network data via the comparison of models of network evolution to the observed data. We take a bayesian approach and perform posterior density estimation using an approximate bayesian computation with sequential Monte Carlo method. Our approach allows us to perform model selection over a selection of potential network growth models. The methodology we apply uses a distance defined in terms of graph spectra which captures the network data more naturally than previously used summary statistics such as the degree distribution. Furthermore, we include the effects of sampling into the analysis, to properly correct for the incompleteness of existing datasets, and have analysed the performance of our method under various degrees of sampling. We consider a number of models focusing not only on the biologically relevant class of duplication models, but also including models of scale-free network growth that have previously been claimed to describe such data. We find a preference for a duplication-divergence with linear preferential attachment model in the majority of the interaction datasets considered. We also illustrate how our method can be used to perform multi-model inference of network parameters to estimate properties of the full network from sampled data.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremEvolution, MolecularModels, StatisticalAnimalsComputer SimulationDrosophila melanogasterEscherichia coliHelicobacter pyloriMonte Carlo MethodProtein Interaction MapsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22552917
PMCPMC3427518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.