Trial reportDer Orthopade2012
[Gait analysis after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty].
Trial report in Der Orthopade, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers of muscle damage increased in anterolateral compared to direct lateral approach to the hip in hemiarthroplasty: no correlation with clinical outcome : Short-term analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomized clinical trial in patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018Trial
- CementedWorld journal of orthopedics · 2026Article
- Possible load after initial implantation of a total hip arthroplasty (THA): comparison of minimal invasive anterolateral approach with direct lateral transgluteal approach according to Bauer.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- A synoptic literature review of animal models for investigating the biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Article
- [Instrumented gait and movement analysis of musculoskeletal diseases].Der Orthopade · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upon implantation of a hip prosthesis by total hip arthroplasty (THA), clinical criteria are not always sufficient for an objective assessment of the functional outcome. Thus, functional improvement of gait behavior was comparatively validated by instrumented 3D gait analysis for a current, minimally invasive surgical approach (MIS; anterolateral approach) and a conventional, transgluteal approach (KONV). In selected cases, disturbed motion sequences were registered by measuring the muscle activity via high-resolution, monopolar surface electromyography (S-EMG) above the operation area. Despite continuous and significant improvement of practically all analyzed kinematic and kinetic gait parameters for both surgical approaches already after 5 weeks but in particular after 6 and 12 months, no significant differences were detected between the 2 procedures for any parameter or time point. The S-EMG demonstrated non-physiological muscle activation on the operated, but also on the non-operated side, even at 6 months after surgery. Advantages of the MIS approach thus seem primarily restricted to early, post-operative results, such as more rapid pain reduction and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.