ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2012
Modulation of thalamic auditory neurons by the primary auditory cortex.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A cortical output channel for perceptual categorization.Science advances · 2026Article
- Corticothalamic projections deliver enhanced responses to medial geniculate body as a function of the temporal reliability of the stimulus.The Journal of physiology · 2021Article
- Low-Intensity Ultrasound Causes Direct Excitation of Auditory Cortical Neurons.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
- Serotonin Transporter Defect Disturbs Structure and Function of the Auditory Cortex in Mice.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Lemniscal Corticothalamic Feedback in Auditory Scene Analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Neuroglial activation in the auditory cortex and medial geniculate body of salicylate-induced tinnitus rats.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Development, organization and plasticity of auditory circuits: Lessons from a cherished colleague.The European journal of neuroscience · 2019Review
- The Effects of Urethane on Rat Outer Hair Cells.Neural plasticity · 2016Article
- Corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory responses.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Review
- Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis.Frontiers in neurology · 2014Review
- Frequency-specific corticofugal modulation of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in mice.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2014Article
- Histaminergic modulation of nonspecific plasticity of the auditory system and differential gating.Journal of neurophysiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The central auditory system consists of the lemniscal and nonlemniscal pathways or systems, which are anatomically and physiologically different from each other. In the thalamus, the ventral division of the medial geniculate body (MGBv) belongs to the lemniscal system, whereas its medial (MGBm) and dorsal (MGBd) divisions belong to the nonlemniscal system. Lemniscal neurons are sharply frequency-tuned and provide highly frequency-specific information to the primary auditory cortex (AI), whereas nonlemniscal neurons are generally broadly frequency-tuned and project widely to cortical auditory areas including AI. These two systems are presumably different not only in auditory signal processing, but also in eliciting cortical plastic changes. Electric stimulation of narrowly frequency-tuned MGBv neurons evokes the shift of the frequency-tuning curves of AI neurons toward the tuning curves of the stimulated MGBv neurons (tone-specific plasticity). In contrast, electric stimulation of broadly frequency-tuned MGBm neurons augments the auditory responses of AI neurons and broadens their frequency-tuning curves (nonspecific plasticity). In our current studies, we found that electric stimulation of AI evoked tone-specific plastic changes of the MGBv neurons, whereas it degraded the frequency tuning of MGBm neurons by inhibiting their auditory responses. AI apparently modulates the lemniscal and nonlemniscal thalamic neurons in quite different ways. High MGBm activity presumably makes AI neurons less favorable for fine auditory signal processing, whereas high MGBv activity makes AI neurons more suitable for fine processing of specific auditory signals and reduces MGBm activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.