ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2012
Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 177 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Standard ART Practice vs. Trophectoderm Biopsy, Whole Chromosome Analysis by Next Generation Sequencing, and Replacement of a Single Euploid Embryo
Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Pregnancy Outcomes Following Selection and Single Embryo Transfer (SET) Based on Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS) by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Versus Standard Morphological Assessment
Cumulative Live Birth Rate With eSET After In-vitro Fertilization With Preim-plantation Genetic Screening by Next Generation Sequencing Versus Conventional In-vitro Fertilization: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
GEnetic Testing in Elective Single Embryo Transfer in Women of Advanced Maternal Age
A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial of Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy and Morphology Compared With Morphology Alone in in Vitro Fertilisation
GEnetic Testing in Elective Single Embryo Transfer (GETSET): A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
177 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy inInternational journal of fertility & sterility · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of recurrent pregnancy failure resulting from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: what technology should you use and what are the differences?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016Pooled it
- Can Comprehensive Chromosome Screening Technology Improve IVF/ICSI Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) still in search of a clinical application: a systematic review.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2014Pooled it
- Comparative study on pregnancy complications: PGT-A vs. IVF-ET with gender-specific outcomes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Trial
- Extended embryo culture is effective for patients of an advanced maternal age.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Trial
- The number of biopsied trophectoderm cells may affect pregnancy outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Trial
- Randomized comparison of next-generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization for preimplantation genetic screening: a pilot study.BMC medical genomics · 2015Trial
- Increasing live birth rate by preimplantation genetic screening of pooled polar bodies using array comparative genomic hybridization.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2015Trial
- Polar body based aneuploidy screening is poorly predictive of embryo ploidy and reproductive potential.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2014Trial
- Elective single embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles with or without preimplantation genetic testing using next-generation sequencing: A randomized clinical trial.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Euploidy rates within blastocysts obtained from differently sized cohorts and age groups approximate a binomial distribution.F&S reports · 2025Article
- Transcriptomics empower assisted reproductive technology in decoding gamete and embryo development potential: a review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- How Many Blastocysts Are Needed for PGT-A to Benefit RPL Patients? A 7-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Inner Cell Mass Grade and Earlier Blastulation Are Associated with Pregnancy Outcomes in Euploid Embryos.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Trophectoderm Biopsy: Present State of the Art.Genes · 2025Review
117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle embryo transfer (SET) remains underutilized as a strategy to reduce multiple gestation risk in IVF, and its overall lower pregnancy rate underscores the need for improved techniques to select one embryo for fresh transfer. This study explored use of comprehensive chromosomal screening by array CGH (aCGH) to provide this advantage and improve pregnancy rate from SET.
methodsFirst-time IVF patients with a good prognosis (age <35, no prior miscarriage) and normal karyotype seeking elective SET were prospectively randomized into two groups: In Group A, embryos were selected on the basis of morphology and comprehensive chromosomal screening via aCGH (from d5 trophectoderm biopsy) while Group B embryos were assessed by morphology only. All patients had a single fresh blastocyst transferred on d6. Laboratory parameters and clinical pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups.
resultsFor patients in Group A (n = 55), 425 blastocysts were biopsied and analyzed via aCGH (7.7 blastocysts/patient). Aneuploidy was detected in 191/425 (44.9%) of blastocysts in this group. For patients in Group B (n = 48), 389 blastocysts were microscopically examined (8.1 blastocysts/patient). Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the morphology + aCGH group compared to the morphology-only group (70.9 and 45.8%, respectively; p = 0.017); ongoing pregnancy rate for Groups A and B were 69.1 vs. 41.7%, respectively (p = 0.009). There were no twin pregnancies.
conclusionAlthough aCGH followed by frozen embryo transfer has been used to screen at risk embryos (e.g., known parental chromosomal translocation or history of recurrent pregnancy loss), this is the first description of aCGH fully integrated with a clinical IVF program to select single blastocysts for fresh SET in good prognosis patients. The observed aneuploidy rate (44.9%) among biopsied blastocysts highlights the inherent imprecision of SET when conventional morphology is used alone. Embryos randomized to the aCGH group implanted with greater efficiency, resulted in clinical pregnancy more often, and yielded a lower miscarriage rate than those selected without aCGH. Additional studies are needed to verify our pilot data and confirm a role for on-site, rapid aCGH for IVF patients contemplating fresh SET.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.