Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22551456›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2012

Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.

Zhihong Yang, Jiaen Liu, Gary S Collins, Shala A Salem, Xiaohong Liu, Sarah S Lyle, Alison C Peck, E Scott Sills, Rifaat D Salem

6 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 177 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01946945 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Standard ART Practice vs. Trophectoderm Biopsy, Whole Chromosome Analysis by Next Generation Sequencing, and Replacement of a Single Euploid Embryo

TypeinterventionalSponsorReprogeneticsRan2013Enrolled240ConditionsInfertility, Recurrent Pregnancy LossArmsNext Generation Sequencing after Blastocyst biopsy
NCT02268786 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Pregnancy Outcomes Following Selection and Single Embryo Transfer (SET) Based on Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS) by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Versus Standard Morphological Assessment

TypeinterventionalSponsorIllumina, Inc.Ran2014 to 2016Enrolled661ConditionsInfertility, AneuploidyArmsPreimplantation Genetic Screening by NGS
NCT03118141 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Cumulative Live Birth Rate With eSET After In-vitro Fertilization With Preim-plantation Genetic Screening by Next Generation Sequencing Versus Conventional In-vitro Fertilization: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChen Zi-JiangRan2017 to 2020Enrolled1,215ConditionsInfertilityArmsblastocyst morphologic score, blastocyst biopsy and sequencing, freeze-all and single thawed blastocyst transfer
NCT04167748 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

GEnetic Testing in Elective Single Embryo Transfer in Women of Advanced Maternal Age

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenomic Prediction Inc.Ran2021 to 2026Enrolled240ConditionsInfertility, FemaleArmsPreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)
NCT04474522 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial of Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy and Morphology Compared With Morphology Alone in in Vitro Fertilisation

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2025Enrolled517ConditionsPreimplantation DiagnosisArmsNon-invasive Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy status
NCT06141135 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

GEnetic Testing in Elective Single Embryo Transfer (GETSET): A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenomic Prediction Inc.Ran2023 to 2026Enrolled240ConditionsInfertility, FemaleArmsPreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGTA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy inInternational journal of fertility & sterility · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. The number of biopsied trophectoderm cells may affect pregnancy outcomes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhihong YangDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology Research, Pacific Reproductive Center, Torrance, CA, 90505, USA. dr.sills@prc-ivf.com.
Jiaen Liu
Gary S Collins
Shala A Salem
Xiaohong Liu
Sarah S Lyle
Alison C Peck
E Scott Sills
Rifaat D Salem

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle embryo transfer (SET) remains underutilized as a strategy to reduce multiple gestation risk in IVF, and its overall lower pregnancy rate underscores the need for improved techniques to select one embryo for fresh transfer. This study explored use of comprehensive chromosomal screening by array CGH (aCGH) to provide this advantage and improve pregnancy rate from SET.

methodsFirst-time IVF patients with a good prognosis (age <35, no prior miscarriage) and normal karyotype seeking elective SET were prospectively randomized into two groups: In Group A, embryos were selected on the basis of morphology and comprehensive chromosomal screening via aCGH (from d5 trophectoderm biopsy) while Group B embryos were assessed by morphology only. All patients had a single fresh blastocyst transferred on d6. Laboratory parameters and clinical pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups.

resultsFor patients in Group A (n = 55), 425 blastocysts were biopsied and analyzed via aCGH (7.7 blastocysts/patient). Aneuploidy was detected in 191/425 (44.9%) of blastocysts in this group. For patients in Group B (n = 48), 389 blastocysts were microscopically examined (8.1 blastocysts/patient). Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the morphology + aCGH group compared to the morphology-only group (70.9 and 45.8%, respectively; p = 0.017); ongoing pregnancy rate for Groups A and B were 69.1 vs. 41.7%, respectively (p = 0.009). There were no twin pregnancies.

conclusionAlthough aCGH followed by frozen embryo transfer has been used to screen at risk embryos (e.g., known parental chromosomal translocation or history of recurrent pregnancy loss), this is the first description of aCGH fully integrated with a clinical IVF program to select single blastocysts for fresh SET in good prognosis patients. The observed aneuploidy rate (44.9%) among biopsied blastocysts highlights the inherent imprecision of SET when conventional morphology is used alone. Embryos randomized to the aCGH group implanted with greater efficiency, resulted in clinical pregnancy more often, and yielded a lower miscarriage rate than those selected without aCGH. Additional studies are needed to verify our pilot data and confirm a role for on-site, rapid aCGH for IVF patients contemplating fresh SET.

Identifiers

PMID22551456
PMCPMC3403960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.