Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22551446›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2012

Quality of care and quality of dying in nursing homes: two measurement models.

Sarah A Thompson, Marjorie Bott, Byron Gajewski, Virginia P Tilden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah A ThompsonCollege of Nursing, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-5330, USA. sathompson@unmc.edu
Marjorie Bott
Byron Gajewski
Virginia P Tilden
University of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

The impact of quality end-of-life care in nursing homesR01NR009547 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FORBES-THOMPSON, SARAH ANN · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NINR NIH HHS NR009547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is consistent evidence of significant variation in the quality of end-of-life care among nursing homes, with many facilities ill-prepared to provide optimal physical and psychological care that is culturally sensitive and respectful of the needs and preferences of residents and their family members. There is continued evidence that what is impeding efforts to improve care is that most measurement tools are hampered by a lack of distinction between quality of care and quality of dying as well as a lack of complete psychometric evaluation. Further, health services researchers cite the need to include "system-level" factors, variables that reflect leadership, culture, or informal practices, all of which influence end-of-life care and can be used to differentiate one setting from another. The purpose of this article is to report advancement in conceptualizing quality end-of-life care in nursing homes and to offer a refined approach to measurement.

methodsTwo latent constructs are tested: quality of care (composed of system-level factors) and quality of dying (comprised of resident/family outcomes). Data obtained from 85 Midwestern nursing homes and 1282 interviews with bereaved family members were used to evaluate both constructs.

resultsConfirmatory factor analyses were conducted and evidence of validity and reliability were obtained for both.

conclusionFor health services researchers, expanded models that include system-level factors as well as more comprehensive and psychometrically sound models of resident outcomes stand to inform efforts to improve care in this very important area.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesQuality of Health CareQuality of LifeAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMidwestern United StatesModels, TheoreticalPsychometricsTerminally Ill

Identifiers

PMID22551446
PMCPMC3362952
OpenAlexW2065350606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.